Sprint says rival Clearwire bid violates law - The Deal Pipeline (SAMPLE CONTENT: NEED AN ID?)
Subscriber Content Preview | Request a free trialSearch  
  Go

Telecom, Media & Technology

Print  |  Share  |  Reprint

Sprint says rival Clearwire bid violates law

by Chris Nolter  |  Published June 4, 2013 at 8:59 AM
Sprint Nextel Corp. CEO Dan Hesse in a Monday letter attempted to disabuse Clearwire Corp.'s board and minority shareholders of the notion that an offer from Dish Network Corp. might actually succeed.

Charlie Ergen's satellite TV company has challenged Sprint's $3.40 per share offer for minority shares of Clearwire with a $4.40 per share bid of its own.

"Many Clearwire stockholders appear to be under the mistaken belief that Dish's proposal is a viable alternative to the Sprint merger agreement," Hesse wrote, "and this is simply not the case."

Hesse told Clearwire's board that a proposal from Dish violates Delaware law and conflicts with the agreement underpinning Sprint's investment in the wireless broadband provider. Hesse said that Dish's proposal is not standard and is not legal. The provision would also violate Sprint's investment agreement with Clearwire.

Among other terms, Dish would require Clearwire to grant it three board seats if it reaches a threshold of 25%. Delaware law allows two paths for mandating board seats, Hesse's letter said. A company can amend its certificate of incorporation or have a vote of a majority of shareholders.

Even if Hesse is correct, Ergen has succeeded in complicating the Clearwire purchase. He may also have gained traction in the bidding for Sprint, even if his ultimate goal may not be to buy the carrier, but rather to disrupt Softbank Corp.'s attempt to acquire a 70% stake in Sprint, and persuade the telecoms to give Dish a favorable wireless services agreement.

Of course, Dish faces a more immediate impediment than Delaware law because Sprint owns a majority stake in Clearwire. As Dave Novosel of Gimme Credit Publications Inc. observed in a Monday note, "Sprint is not going away."

Crest Financial Ltd., which owns more than 8% of Clearwire's Class A shares and has a voting position of about 4%, reiterated its opposition to Sprint's offer to minority shareholders.

"We believe that Sprint's goal all along has been to lock up Clearwire on the cheap, while selling itself to Softbank, or another suitor, at a premium," Crest's general counsel, David Schumacher, said in a Monday statement.

Ergen has lodged a bid for Sprint itself although his ultimate goal may be to press Sprint and Softbank into a wireless services agreement, rather than to buy the telecom outright.

There were conflicting proxy recommendations on May 31 regarding Softbank's bid for Sprint.

Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. suggested that Sprint shareholders should accept Softbank's offer.

ISS assigned Softbank's cash-and-stock bid a valuation of $6.45 per share, which it noted is a 28% premium to the stock price before rumors of a deal surfaced. It also exceeds the multiple of 5.2 times Ebitda that T-Mobile USA Inc. paid for MetroPCS Communications Inc. and a median price target of $5.50 per share of analysts that ISS surveyed.

The firm said it did not consider Dish's bid in its analysis, however, because it had not made a direct tender.

Egan-Jones Ratings Co. reached the opposite conclusion.

Citing a "strong potential for an improved offer for the company from Softbank," Egan-Jones said, "it would be unwise at this time for the company's shareholders to approve the merger agreement with Softbank in its current form."

The Sprint-Clearwire-Softbank-Dish conflict should come to a head in less than two weeks.

Sprint shareholders will vote June 12 on Softbank's buyout offer, and Clearwire's vote will follow on June 13.

"At the end of the day, we think Charlie ends up getting a network host and some spectrum," Wells Fargo Securities LLC analysts Jennifer Fritzsche, Marci Ryvicker and Andrew Spinola stated in a Monday report.

"If you were Sprint and Softbank, wouldn't you rather have Charlie and his spectrum on your side, rather than compete against him?" they asked. "The answer is probably yes."

Share:
Tags: Charlie Ergen | Clearwire | Crest Financial | Dan Hesse | Delaware | Dish Network | Gimme Credit Publications | MetroPCS Communications | Softbank | Sprint Nextel | T-Mobile USA

Meet the journalists

Chris Nolter

Senior Writer: Media & Telecom



Movers & Shakers

Launch Movers and shakers slideshow

CalPERS, which divested all of its $4 billion invested hedge funds, named Ted Eliopoulos as chief investment officer. For other updates launch today's Movers & shakers slideshow.

Video

$130B is no problem for too-big-to-fail financial insitutions

While the Federal Reserve and other regulators have imposed more than $130 billion in fines against these too-big-to-fail institutions, industry observers see the punishment to be a short term blip, despite the gravity of the offenses and outcry from consumers. More video

Sectors