The Deal
Sunday, November 8, 
5:26 am

Destination: China

[ Share ]  [ E-mail ]  [ Leave a Comment ]

AllenKohan2006.pngExecuting transactions in China can be tough even for very large companies with plenty of resources on hand there. For firms a few rungs down on the global rankings, the challenges multiply.

Allen Kohan now works for a unit of Germany-based chemical giant BASF AG, a company in the first category. But until recently he was doing deals in China for a company in the second: Engelhard Corp., acquired by BASF for $5.6 billion in a deal that closed in June. As director of corporate development for Engelhard, he played a key role in the transactions that got the Iselin, N.J.-based surface and materials-science company established there.

Although Engelhard was a Fortune 500 company with a long-established Asia-Pacific division and operations in Japan and South Korea, it didn't make its first investment in China until 1999. That deal was the first of three Kohan closed over a six year period, making repeated trips from New Jersey to do so. The total value of the investments was less than $100 million, and just a fraction of the $1 billion-plus worth of deals Kohan has executed for Engelhard. But the price tags belie the strategic significance of the transactions and the considerable learning involved.

The process began in the mid-1990s with high-level discussions between senior Engelhard management and officials of Sinopec, China's huge, state-owned energy and chemical company. Those relationships set the stage for the 1999 deal, an environmental catalyst joint venture in Shanghai formed with an existing Sinopec JV; the 2002 purchase of a Shanxi province kaolin business from a company with combined private and government ownership; and the 2005 purchase from a Sinopec subsidiary in Nanjing of its syngas catalyst business.

Kohan recently discussed his China experiences with Corporate Dealmaker's Kenneth Klee. Excerpts:

Corporate Dealmaker: Let's start with that first JV for environmental catalysts. Why take that business to China? And why use a joint venture?

Kohan: We were following the automotive market, since a lot of the OEMs -- GM, Ford, Volkswagen -- were setting up facilities there. If you're not manufacturing in China, then you're at a disadvantage financially once you get up to substantial volumes. JV structures should be avoided if possible, but at that time, you more or less had to have a partner. Our partner was there only to facilitate our investment; they brought nothing, business-wise. We invested in the facilities -- initially, a small pilot plant. It was our technology, our sales and marketing know-how.

Tell me about the negotiations, starting with the people Engelhard brought to the table.

Well, there would be somebody from Engelhard's Asia Pacific unit. Our internal counsel. Attorneys with local experience, some of them with specialized knowledge in tax or environmental rules. On some occasions, we needed accountants.

The negotiations proceeded with some difficulty. We did a lot of learning, about how it takes much longer to transact a deal than one would anticipate in a Western situation, about the formality of negotiations -- how the order of seating in itself is very important. And about the preeminence of relationships.

The discussions themselves are extended. With the need for translation, you cover fewer parts of a contract in a session. There's always backtracking, returning to issues you thought were settled. Don't tell your counterparties you have a specific departure date, because some of those issues are sure to be brought up at the last minute.

We ended up with a 60% majority stake, and 18 months later, when the foreign ownership rules changed, we bought out our partner. We went on to open a larger facility in 2004. The market for automotive catalysts is growing, and it's turning into a profitable business.

Your next deal was in Shanxi province, 360 miles southwest of Beijing. How did you end up out there?

That was our purchase of Shuozhou Anpeak Kaolin in 2002. This type of kaolin is a byproduct of coal, which is mined in that area. There are also government incentives to invest in the interior. We knew the players through our involvement in the business, and we started with another target, but it didn't work out. So we went for this one, a very small-scale business, less than 10 years old, a private company co-owned by a private entity and the local government.

What were the big issues?

Employment is a big, big objective. That's a concern in any transaction. The company wants you to take as many people as they can negotiate for, and far more than you would need in a comparable operation elsewhere. The whole social and political context is important. So we've learned to set up what we call an advisory committee, which facilitates local relationships with our business.

The Engelhard Asia Pacific president is part of the advisory committee, together with the head of the business, and the senior person we were negotiating with. They establish relationships with local officials. It's not formal or contractual, but it's a critical group that helps very much in navigating local regulations. It's more important than any contracts.

Your biggest deal was the purchase of Nanjing Catalyst from a unit of Sinopec in 2005. Was it complicated?

It took about a year, which is relatively quick if you're negotiating with a state-related entity. It was complicated, though, partly because it was a carve-out, and there were other entities that we had to negotiate contractual relationships with.

And there was the inevitable backtracking -- for example, on selling a certain set of buildings we had previously agreed to purchase. They said, 'No, we're not going to sell it to you. We'll lease it to you, so you'll be able to use it, but you won't own it. And by the way, our lease terms are going to be outrageous.'

What do you do in that situation?

You ask for something in return. Not something directly affecting the purchase price, because internally, within the seller's organization, the selling price has been agreed. In this case we got some laboratory assets that we didn't think we were going to be able to access. Some office space. It has an element of haggling to it.

Can you talk a little about integrating these acquisitions?

There are regulatory issues, because the rules are going to be more strictly enforced on a foreign owner. There are cultural issues; the employees are used to an environment where there's not much emphasis on individual performance and responsibility. Before closing, you need to hire a good manager to run the business. We also brought a mentor in from Engelhard to teach the manager how Western business works. But perhaps the single most important guideline is to hire a comptroller before the deal is consummated. This person should be able to speak English and should understand Western accounting control standards -- how books are kept and how financial statements are put together. These people are in high demand; they're not easy to find.

All in all, our integration costs were higher than expected. Many people were making trips to China and staying longer. There was much more to do in terms of organizing the business, transferring technology, working with local officials, using outside support for addressing environmental and legal issues.

You mention tech transfer. How do you protect intellectual property in your Chinese operations?

Basically, one has to assume that there will be no IP protection; we're reluctant to send our latest technology there. We try to develop technology and know-how that will be unique to China and couldn't be used elsewhere. We also parcel pieces of the technology to many individuals, so that no one at the operation knows the total picture.

Also, to protect your technology you have to continue your development efforts. If your competitor learned something about your technology that you did three years ago, then you're already on to newer technology today. This strategy is really the only successful defense.

So how would you sum up the difference between making a deal in China and making one in the West?

In China, you don't move in a straight line. You zig and zag. Eventually you arrive at a place that's different than where you thought you were going, and you arrive there differently. Hopefully the deal is still worthwhile. CD



Join Corporate Dealmaker's LinkedIn forum

Comments
Post a comment


Search


Search For

Corporate Dealmaker Video


Linklaters' Schmidt on Pfizer-Wyeth review

Linklaters' Schmidt says how regulators handled Pfizer Inc.'s acquisition of Wyeth is an outlier of how others merger reviews will be conducted.
Decade of The Deal


Movers & Shakers


Juergen Lasowski
Onyx Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Edward Swallow
Northrop Grumman Corp.

Owen Mahoney
Outspark

Alice Kim
FLO TV Inc.

Eric Hausler
Isle of Capri Casinos Inc.
Juergen Lasowski, Onyx Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Edward Swallow, Northrop Grumman Corp.
Owen Mahoney, Outspark
Alice Kim, FLO TV Inc.
Eric Hausler, Isle of Capri Casinos Inc.


COMPLETE MOVERS & SHAKERS ARCHIVES

The Magazine


MACDdec1cover.gifAnd the winners are...
Even in a period when things like toxic credit default swaps and noxious structured investment vehicles dominate the conversation in many parts of the deal community, people are still willing to take the time to recognize skill and achievement in the strategic transactions that help those companies adapt and grow.
View the complete issue


Last Issue
Archives
Suggest a topic
Purchase a reprint
Subscribe to The Deal


Monthly Archives


Syndicate

Contributors

footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg


©Copyright 2009, The Deal, LLC. All rights reserved. Please send all technical questions, comments or concerns to the Webmaster.