Is corporate development coming of age as a distinct, clearly defined profession? What are the qualifications and career paths of the people who do it? Where do they fit in the organizations that employ them? How much do they earn? How strong is the market for their skills, and what will happen as the deal cycle turns?
At a time when transactions have gained unprecedented importance as an element of corporate strategy, these questions are still not so easy to answer. Though companies in the main are getting better at executing deals, and much of the credit belongs to more sophisticated deal teams that fit better into their organizations, the jobs of those in corporate development are still a lot like the transactions themselves: There are plenty of common themes, but no two are exactly alike.
Ask 10 different in-house deal specialists about their backgrounds and responsibilities, and you'll get 10 very different stories, as you can see in the profiles that accompany this report. Ask more than a half-dozen executive recruiters and consultants about the field, as we also did for this report, and you'll be reminded that corporate development remains one of the least examined functions in the executive suite. Chief executive officers, chief financial officers, general counsels and human resource managers all inhabit territory that's a lot better mapped, with various observers having compiled far more data about career trajectories, talent recruitment and retention, department structure and responsibilities, compensation and other variables.
Still, we know a lot more about corp dev than we used to. Both Ernst & Young LLP and KPMG LLP did solid studies of the function in 2004, for example, and KPMG will release an updated survey early next year, which largely confirms the trends noted last time. More information comes from executive recruiters such as CTPartners and Heidrick & Struggles, which reports a significant increase in corporate development searches; Heidrick has compiled some salary information based on recent placements (see chart). And the company profiles we've compiled since we launched this magazine in late 2003 also help us to bring this developing field of expertise into focus.
What do we see? Some things you'd expect, and a few you might not. Corporate development folks still come to the job from a wide variety of backgrounds, including law, consulting and investment banking, and it's not unusual for them to go back to being a service provider after a stint in the corporate world. The M&A wave that probably crested earlier this year produced a strong job market for corporate development talent, partly because middle-market companies have been creating or expanding in-house deal capabilities. Yet salaries haven't surged, headhunters and compensation consultants say. Middle-market companies usually offer middle-market pay, and even big ones can't offer anything like I-banker rewards without upsetting their whole pay scale. According to Mercer Human Resource Consulting LLC, mean total comp for a company's top M&A exec is a respectable but certainly not lavish $350,000 per year.
The responsibilities and reporting relationship of the corporate development leader vary greatly depending on, among other things, the industry and acquisitiveness of the company. That said, both the Ernst & Young and KPMG reports found that a majority of the dealmakers in their surveys report to the chief financial officer. There's also a trend toward smaller teams at the corporate level as deal teams get better at drawing on in-house functional experts and, most important, collaborating closely with operating units on integration and pushing dealmaking expertise out into the organization.
While not universal, the trend toward decentralization contrasts with a common approach during the previous M&A boom, when some companies used larger, more centralized deal teams to try to drive deals in a more top-down manner -- with limited success. It may also mean that corporate development folks, now more connected within their companies and with some more validation of their value to the organization, will enjoy more job security in a downturn than they did after the tech bubble burst in 2000 and many were laid off.
But as with so much else about this still-evolving line of work, that question will be addressed company by company as those organizations chart their courses in a changing world. What's clear right now -- as you'll see in the pages that follow -- is just how much corporate dealmaking jobs already matter.
| Recently filled corp dev jobs, and what they pay |
| These seven searches by the executive recruitment firm Heidrick & Struggles provide a window on duties and compensation for corporate development professionals in various settings. |
|
Hiring company |
Approx. revenues at time of search ($mill.) |
Title |
Direct report (when available)/ Job Responsibilities |
Placement's Former Position and Title |
Base/ First-year bonus/ Date Completed |
| Midwest-based manufacturing company |
$22,000 |
VP, Business Planning/ Development |
- Reports to the CFO
- Develops strategy for companywide growth
- Sources and executes M&A
- Integration of acquired companies
|
Vice president, business development, divisional level (Fortune 500 manufacturer) |
$240,000 $60,000 Aug. '06 |
| Northeast-based specialty retailer |
$6,000 |
VP, M&A |
- Leads companywide corporate development initiatives
- Sources and executes M&A at the corporate level
- Partners with divisional development teams on due diligence and processing of divisional-level acquisition opportunities
|
Senior associate (venture capital firm) |
$230,000 $75,000 Oct. '06 |
| Private, U.K.-based business services company |
$400 |
Corporate Development Director |
- Develops strategy for companywide growth through international expansion or related income streams
- Sources, performs due diligence and executes M&A integration of acquired companies
|
Assistant director, transaction support (public accounting and consulting firm) |
$199,970 $39,994 May '07 |
| Middle Atlantic-based utility company |
$950 |
VP, Research and Corporate Development |
- Reports to the chairman/president/CEO
- Assists executive team in strategy development
- Assist all levels of management with the translation and implementation of strategy into financial and operational objectives
- Assesses and analyzes markets to help define corporate strategy
- Evaluates targets and executes M&A
|
Vice president & CFO, Eastern Division (Fortune 50 retailer) |
$200,000 $65,000 May '07 |
| Midwest-based consumer products manufacturer |
$3,000 |
VP, Strategy & Business Development |
- Reports to the senior vice president for Global Operations
- Develops strategy with key members of CEO staff and business unit managers
- Works with external consultants
- Leads strategic planning process
- Evaluates targets and executes M&A
|
Vice president, business development (Fortune 500 manufacturer) |
$200,000 $70,000 March '07 |
| Northeast-based insurance company |
$2,500 |
VP, Business Development |
- Build and lead a corporate development program to assess and execute M&A and joint ventures
- Works closely with the president and CEO, COO/CFO, as well as the senior leadership group, to identify and explore growth opportunities
- Drive refinement and expansion of existing business strategies
|
Managing director, global insurance practice (consulting firm) |
$325,000 60% target July '06 |
| Midwest-based health care company |
$21,000 |
VP, Corporate Development |
- Reports to the senior vice president of finance
- Defines, identifies and develops growth opportunities in alignment with business strategy and objectives
- Works with business units to shape acquisition strategies consistent with corporate objectives
|
Vice president, corporate development (Fortune 500 telecom company) |
$225,000 $78,750 July '05 |
|
|
WHERE THEY COME FROM
Some corporate development practitioners move into the specialty from another post in their company or from a company in the same industry. As many as half of the dealmakers we've profiled here followed that path, depending on how you keep score. But the sources we spoke with say that the majority of people taking up junior and senior positions in corp dev move into the field from a service job, typically strategy consulting, law or investment banking. Many have a history with their new corporate employers, having served as advisers on previous deals.
Hiring from outside is obviously a good way for companies to add deal experience in a hurry. Inevitably, though, there are issues of culture and compensation that the hiring company must overcome. An experienced I-banker might be making $3 million to $6 million, most of that in cash with some restricted stock. Few corporations can come close to matching that. Even those bankers who are willing to take a pay cut may still outearn other senior corporate staffers or top business managers.
"It can create a pressure-filled environment to start paying these staff people, that are not viewed as revenue drivers, an amount equal to or higher than the top operating executive or the CFO, because within the corporate ranks, nobody sees these guys as being equally as important," says Dan Ryterband, president of the compensation consulting firm Frederic W. Cook & Co. "The argument has always been, 'If we had to pay an investment bank, we'd be paying them a 4% or 5% commission or a flat fee. So for what we're paying this guy, we're probably saving $40 million.' That is a very difficult thing to sell to the compensation committee or internally to the rest of the management team."
Though perhaps to a lesser extent, the same issues exist for consultants or lawyers making a switch. Naturally, a change is easier earlier in a career. The best approach, says Ryterband, is to look for a banker -- or lawyer or consultant -- who is ready to embrace that change. It would be someone who is tired of the client-driven lifestyle or who is hungry for a position that provides greater strategic challenges that he or she can see through from sourcing to integration.
That was the case with Craig Farlie, who runs the middle-market investment banking firm Farlie, Turner & Co. but who early in his career abandoned that profession for business school and then corporate development. After graduating from Princeton in 1989, Farlie spent two years as a financial analyst for PaineWebber Inc. on Wall Street before leaving for the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. "I decided that there was more to life than working 90 hours a week and living in a very small studio in New York," says Farlie. "Instead of going to museums and Broadway plays, I ended up sitting on my couch watching MTV because I was so exhausted."
It was enough to convince Farlie that post-Wharton he wanted to pursue a corporate position. Ultimately, Farlie spent five years working in corporate development at Blockbuster Entertainment Group and solid waste giant Republic Industries Inc., where he played a key role in the strategic rollup of dozens of small garbage companies, before co-founding Farlie Turner in 2004.
Finding someone who really craves a different lifestyle helps not just with compensation but also with the cultural disconnect. This can be large, especially with investment bankers. "There's a lot of bad behavior that you can get away with in a banking environment that is just viewed totally negatively in a corporate environment," says Ryterband. "Not all bankers are difficult to deal with, but there can be huge egos involved, and superstar status at an investment bank doesn't necessarily translate into superstar status in a corporation, where for the most part the management team is viewed as equal."
Investment bankers making the switch also need to remember that they don't yet have all the skills they'll need. Their expertise in deal structures and complex modeling is welcome, and they may also bring a strong network of industry contacts. But I-bankers tend to know a lot less about corporate strategy and nearly nothing about integration planning and execution, core concerns for any senior-level corporate dealmaker.
"I think the traditional finance man or woman, for instance, is at a little bit of a disadvantage," says Martin Mendelsohn, a partner with executive recruiter CTPartners "That person may have a CPA or CFA, but the M.B.A. with a degree in strategy and corporate finance may be more adaptable."
Not many corporate development professionals begin their deal careers straight out of business school. The reason is twofold: B-schools don't train students in dealmaking with the same rigor and thoroughness applied to, say, finance or marketing, and, perhaps as a result, corporations rarely recruit new M.B.A. grads for corporate development positions.
That may change as more companies recognize corporate development as a significant contributor to long-term growth and survival. B-schools may begin tailoring programs for students interested in careers in dealmaking, and more corporations may look inside their own companies for promising young employees to groom.
But for now, filling a corporate development job is most often a matter of bringing in someone who has built up experience outside the company, either at a service provider or on a corp dev team at another company. And the most important criterion is likely to be experience that's directly relevant to the company's strategic priorities. "If they're from manufacturing, there's a strong preference towards getting someone who's done deals in manufacturing," says Michele Heid, managing director of Heidrick and Struggles. "If the company is global, they want someone who's had experience in the regions they're trying to penetrate."
HOW THEY FIT IN
Industry, corporate culture and where a company is in its growth cycle all help determine the number of people doing corp dev at a company and how they fit into the organization. As a result there's plenty of variety, with, for example, some larger teams being deeply involved in setting strategy and some smaller ones mainly focused on deal execution.
In general, though, dealmaking teams have tended to become leaner in recent years. KPMG principal and U.S. practice leader Christopher Gottlieb says companies are recognizing that smaller teams with an average of three to eight members and the ability to staff up with in-house functional experts and external advisers on a deal-by-deal basis are simply more effective.
To cite one example of the trend: in the late 1990s, Minneapolis-based Best Buy Co., the giant electronics retailer we profiled in these pages in 2005, created a large deal team under an executive vice president who reported to founder and then CEO Richard Schulze. Charged with coming up with ideas, that team did a couple of good deals and one very bad one, the purchase of CD retail chain Musicland Stores Corp.for $685 million in 2000. Today, under CEO Brad Anderson, Schulze's protégé and successor, the deal team is smaller and tied tightly into the CFO's office. Strategies, including deal ideas, are more likely to come from the field than from headquarters.
Over in Des Moines, Iowa, meanwhile, the 105-year-old media company Meredith Corp. has another setup. At Meredith -- which owns titles such as Better Homes & Gardens, Family Circle and American Baby and operates more than a dozen television stations -- the deal team consists of the chief development officer, John Zieser, who also serves as general counsel and secretary, and 2-1/2 dealmaking professionals. The team pulls in expertise as needed from legal and corporate communications, which both report to Zieser, and functional groups such as human resources and finance. And, partly because of the industry in which it operates, the deal team both vets proposals from businesses and sources deals on its own, a change from Zieser's previous employer, the credit and debit card transaction processor First Data Corp.
"At First Data, my development activities tended to be more around execution as opposed to sourcing, because that culture just tended to consolidate businesses, so the targets were fairly clear," says Zieser. "In the media world, there are very few consolidation opportunities because the properties that are successful tend to be owned by the same entities for long periods of time."
So where would you find a larger, more centralized deal team these days? Well, there's one at a particular Fortune 500 industrial firm. A corp dev exec there (who asked us not to name his company because of current deal activity) says the team consists of 18 executives, 10 working on transactions and eight on strategy.
For the most part, though, KPMG's Gottlieb reports that even large organizations in growth mode now tend to prefer smaller deal teams that work closely with other corporate staff and operating businesses, and he expects that trend to continue.
Who those teams report to can offer clues to the responsibilities of a corporate development department and its prominence within the company. Generally speaking, when corporate development reports to the CEO, the function is more strategic. When it reports to the CFO, the focus is more heavily on executing transactions, and strategy lives in a separate department led by another senior-level executive.
Josh King (who writes the Corporate Tool column in Corporate Dealmaker and serves on the magazine's advisory board) has had experience with three corporate development operations, each with a different in-house design. At broadband network service provider Clearwire Corp., where King heads up spectrum acquisition, corporate development reports to the CEO. At AT&T Wireless, where he was a VP of corporate development before that company's sale to Cingular Wireless, the department reported to the executive vice president of strategy, who reported to the CEO. And at Cingular, where King stayed on for six months post-sale to finish up some divestitures, the in-house dealmaking team reported to the CFO.
In most cases, King says, making corporate development a direct report to the CFO is a mistake. The best corporate development groups, he believes, are those with the freedom to aggressively explore a range of deal opportunities, some of which may be at odds with the objectives and concerns of the CFO. At its worst, he thinks, such a reporting structure can derail corporate strategy.
"At Clearwire, if corporate development and spectrum development reported to the CFO, I don't think it would be a problem at all, because our CFO is very strategic," says King. "On the flip side, I really liked the CFO at AT&T Wireless, but he was very conservative, and it would have made dealmaking harder by acting as a throttle on deals that we would have brought to senior management's attention."
It's not surprising that experienced corporate dealmakers would prize the strategic aspects of their jobs and argue against reporting relationships that could limit their ability to contribute on that front. Still, reporting to the CFO is the rule, not the exception for corp dev leaders. KPMG's 2004 survey of 221 corporate development executives, titled "Leading Practices in Corporate Development Departments," found 53% reported to the CFO and 28% to the CEO. That's not so different from Ernst & Young's 2004 "Corporate Development Officer Study," which interviewed 175 executives and found that 43% reported to the CFO, 38% to the CEO.
Diane Harris, president of M&A advisory firm Hypotenuse Enterprises Inc., doesn't expect a change, particularly in a post-Sarbanes Oxley environment. "The CEO wants the CFO to own SOX," says Harris, "and doesn't want the CFO and the corporate development officer pointing fingers at each other if something goes wrong."
WHERE CAN THEY GO?
There's not much hard data available on turnover rates for corporate development officers, but based on anecdotal evidence from recruiters and practitioners, the job market for experienced dealmakers is strong. Recruiters are doing more searches -- Heid says she did very few corporate development searches between 2000 and 2005 but has done more than a dozen in the last 18 months.
Some dealmakers are recruited for new jobs, while others seek out new opportunities because there's not much room for professional growth inside a small corporate development department. Either way, their experience in strategy and deal execution, together with their industry expertise, makes them attractive hires. "That's a valuable accumulation of skills that would allow one to be successful in other professions," says Burke St. John, vice chairman and head of the financial services practice at CTPartners in New York. "When you boil it down, it's a supply-and-demand issue driven by a few factors: the available population with the right skill set and where we are in the economic cycle. We're coming off a huge PE boom, followed by strategic buyers being more active. These are leading the demand for talent."
Much of that demand comes from middle-market companies looking to build in-house deal expertise. It's less likely, says St. John, that an investment bank would recruit from a corporate development group, partly because selling skills are so much more important in the banking world. PE firms, meanwhile, tend to be more interested in operational and finance specialists than in corporate dealmaking talent. After all, they already have plenty of dealmakers.
Because corporate development executives work so closely with the business units, a common exit from the field is to transition into an operational role. This can be a good thing both for the business unit and for corporate development, particularly if the corp dev function rotates in a promising operations executive. The more time dealmakers spend gaining experience in other areas of the company, says KPMG's Gottlieb, the higher the rate of deal success for that company. That's backed up by the firm's 2004 survey data. About 20% of the 221 corporate development groups studied had rotational programs in place. Most of those achieved 75% or more of their expected synergies, and deal success was 30% higher than in companies where corporate development executives never leave the department. The most successful programs, says Gottlieb, trade a corporate development executive for a business unit manager for a period of 18 months to two years. The same programs can also be used to attract top talent, which over time could lead to more young talent choosing corporate development as an entrée into the corporate world.
"It can be difficult for very old, sleepy companies to attract the best people from Harvard or Wharton into their businesses," Gottlieb says. "It's hard to compete with the banks and consultants. But M&A is sexy right now, and they can attract top talent into M&A, then rotate those people out into the company."
It's easy to see how experience in a different job can give a dealmaker (or a line executive) a deeper perspective. Take the case of Meredith's chief development officer, Zieser. After six years as a lawyer with Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, he joined the in-house legal department at First Data and then quickly transitioned into corporate development, where he spent three years. He then became group president for the company's $450 million, 1,000-employee merchant services business.
"When I became an operating group president myself, my attitude totally changed around deals because I had to manage a budget and all this deal was going to do was add to my incentive bonus and cause the risk of disruption if the deal didn't work out," says Zieser. "It's interesting looking back how much I changed from thinking, 'I'm bringing these deals that I think make sense, but these fellows won't sponsor them' to 'Now I'm one of those embedded managers, and I'm not sure I'm so open-minded either.' "
HOW MUCH DO THEY EARN?
Despite the recent strong demand for corporate development talent, headhunters and compensation consultants say they haven't seen a general surge in salaries. This may seem anomalous, but it's consistent with the other trends we've noted. With even large companies preferring smaller deal teams, job growth is coming more in the lower-paying middle-market world. Meanwhile, there's no way that the majority of corp dev leaders who report to CFOs are going to outearn those CFOs or get paid at a rate that upsets the broader corporate pay scale. "I believe that the constraint on salary increases is related to internal equity considerations rather than market dynamics," says Frederic W. Cook's Ryterband.
Returning to the figures from Mercer Human Resource Consulting, the mean base salary for a company's top M&A executive is around $230,000, based on the firm's 2006 "Finance, Accounting & Legal Compensation Survey," which collected data on more than 120,000 employees worldwide. Factor in bonus pay and long-term incentives, and the mean jumps to about $350,000. That squares with data from KPMG and Heidrick &å Struggles.
It's important to note, though, that just as a corp dev leader's responsibilities can vary considerably depending upon what company he or she works for, so can pay. "We've done corp dev searches for jobs with a $200,000 base and a million-dollar base," says Heidrick & Struggles' Heid. "The size of the company is always relevant, but there are other factors. Where are they in their growth strategy? What kind of competitive pressures are they under? If they need to make moves based on the competition and they need to do something fast, they're willing to pay somebody more because the amount of shareholder value this person can create if done correctly is enormous."
Genzyme Corp.'s executive vice president for legal and corporate development, Peter Wirth, who also serves as chief legal officer and secretary, comes down on the high end of the pay scale. His total compensation last year, according to the company's proxy statement, was nearly $3.2 million -- including base pay of $675,500 and bonus and long-term incentives of $2.51 million -- making him the second-highest-paid executive in the company behind CEO Henri A. Termeer.
Structuring a corp dev leader's compensation is no easy task. Various prickly questions emerge around bonus pay and long-term incentives -- especially as companies trend away from stock options now that they have to expense them. Linking pay to performance is tricky for any corporate staff position because those departments don't make or sell anything other than their services to operating units. It can, however, be particularly tough in corporate development, where executives may have little control over measurable long-term deal outcomes such as revenue or cost reductions.
Further complicating things is the difficulty of benchmarking the pay scales. "When you have a very defined position such as CFO, general counsel or human resources manager, it's easier to develop a set of compensation data," says Gregg Passin, principal with Mercer. "In corporate development, where the roles and responsibilities of the position and its prominence within the company vary, it's more difficult to do so."
The result is that there is little comparative data available to CEOs and compensation committees setting salaries for corporate development executives. Many companies link bonuses and long-term incentives to the effectiveness of the deal process and measurable due diligence outcomes. The corporate development executive at the Fortune 500 industrial giant mentioned earlier says his bonus is 35% to 50% of his base salary. Long-term stock incentives are another 35% to 50% of base. Both the cash bonus and stock are influenced by overall company performance (40%) and individual performance (60%). Individual performance, he says, is measured on how smoothly the functional deal team ran, whether the stated timeline was met, and whether the assumptions developed during due diligence were accurate.
WHAT'S NEXT?
The cyclicality of the M&A market is never far from any dealmaker's mind, corporate dealmakers included. And for good reason. "The bust of 2000 had a significant impact on corporate development departments," says Adam Lehman, who helped build America Online Inc.'s corporate development function in the late 1990s. "Corporate restructuring occurred within major companies, which led to downsizing of corporate development. Corporate development is always vulnerable because it's often viewed as a luxury rather than a necessity."
Is that perception changing, though? The evidence we've gathered suggests that it is. Despite the heated deal market, most companies haven't gone crazy building big in-house deal teams. The teams they have built are more disciplined and tightly woven into the organization. And with external growth initiatives -- whether M&A, joint ventures or strategic alliances -- now better understood by CEOs and boards as central to success, the skills being honed inside corporate development departments are sure to remain in demand.
And yet corporate development positions are likely to remain more subject to change, for better and sometimes for worse, than many other kinds of executive positions. Just for starters, the post comes with all the political complexities that some corporate staff jobs are known for. What's more, the jobs can also be closely identified with particular strategies -- which, of course, are subject to change.
Stats are hard to come by, but anecdotal evidence suggests that turnover in senior corp dev positions is high compared with other functions. On the other hand, some senior corp dev leaders have been in place for a while and expect to spend their careers in the field, perhaps in that very job. In different ways, both kinds of shops face the problem of making sure they have adequate experience on hand while also providing career paths for the smart, ambitious people they need.
Given that challenge -- and the nature of the work itself -- bringing in outsiders may always be a significant part of the mix. And corporate development career paths, while they may become a bit more predictable, may never be terribly linear.
But why would they be? The corp dev function, after all, is the chief mechanism through which companies are learning to interact with the most dynamic parts of the economy. On a fundamental level, it's about change. And corp dev folks seem quite comfortable with that. - Suzanne Stevens
A treasurer turned oil-patch dealmaker
Al Richey has been one busy buyer and seller in the past 18 months. Last year, he simultaneously spirited through Anadarko Petroleum Corp.'s $22.5 billion acquisitions of Kerr-McGee Corp. and Western Gas Resources Inc., the first double merger in the industry. He followed that up by leading a $13 billion to $15 billion asset divestiture program to pay off the deals' debt and more finely tune Anadarko's assets (the company has sold $13 billion to date, with its Venezuelan assets still to go). Richey is an industry veteran who earned an M.B.A. from the University of Virginia's Darden School of Business in 1974. He held a variety of dealmaking and financial posts at Transocean Inc., United Energy Resources Inc. and privately held Sandefer Oil & Gas Inc.
He joined Anadarko as treasurer in 1987, a year after the company was spun off from pipeline giant Panhandle Eastern Corp. "Anadarko was small, with about $10 million in net income, and was primarily a drilling company," he says. He added vice president to his title in 1995 and in 2005 was tapped by new CFO Al Walker to become vice president of corporate development. "He asked me if I would like a change, so I left the comfortable confines of treasury to do this. Six months later, we did a double merger." Richey manages a team of 23, half in acquisitions and divestitures and half in development. While the company is not a serial acquirer, the corporate development team is always open to offers. "You have to kiss a lot of frogs before you find your prince," says Richey, who celebrates his 20-year anniversary with Anadarko this year. "It seems like I just came here for a cup of coffee," he quips. "I'll let my wife pick the award." -- Claire Poole
Law, AOL in the 1990s and now venture capital
dam Lehman has been a lawyer, a playwright, an entrepreneur and a corporate dealmaker, who spent much of the 1990s helping to build a fledgling America Online Inc. into an Internet titan.
A graduate of Harvard Law School, Leh- man spent nearly three years at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP before landing in 1995 at AOL, which, at the time, was third in the market behind Prodigy Communications Corp. and CompuServ.
"There wasn't a tremendously deep corps of dealmakers embedded inside the company. I took the job on the legal side, and the first couple of years were an absolute whirlwind. We did literally hundreds of deals."
Lehman moved into business affairs (which eventually absorbed AOL's corporate development function), where he helped scale the department from 15 to 150 people. As a senior vice president, he also had responsibility for building AOL's international presence. "I probably made 20 trips to Europe one year seeking new opportunities where we could plant a flag through acquisitions or joint ventures." It was about the time of the AOL/Time Warner merger in 2000 that burnout began to set in. "It became eminently clear to me that AOL was not going to be highly nimble at a time when it was important that it be highly nimble. At the same time, I was coming off 7-1/2 years of really intense work and a huge amount of international travel."
After taking a sabbatical, during which he wrote 40 plays, many of them performed in community theaters or off, off Broadway venues, Lehman tapped his entrepreneurial side, co-founding seven companies and the venture firm Rock Ridge Ventures in 2002. So does he miss corporate dealmaking? "When AOL was in high-growth mode, and I had all the resources and momentum of AOL at my back, it was crazed in terms of lifestyle, but it was a fantastic stretch." -- Suzanne Stevens
The 17-year itch
It's not unusual for an in-house legal counsel to transition to corporate development. What is a bit unexpected is for the change to take place after nearly two decades. That was the case for Aqua America Inc.'s Mark Kropilak who after 17 years working on the company's legal team, earned an M.B.A. from Villanova University in 2002. He became vice president of corporate development later that year and in February was promoted to senior vice president. He also serves as the company's corporate counsel.
The Pennsylvania native, who earned his law degree from Columbia University, joined Aqua America after a stint at Philadelphia law firm Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, where he practiced public utility, environmental and administrative law.
The combination of skills needed to succeed in corporate development--finance, law, marketing, communications--can overwhelm newcomers to the field, says Kropilak, who in his 22 years with Aqua America has worked on hundreds of deals. Beyond valuing and structuring deals, he says, "there's the whole psychology of working with the other party."
That is why at Aqua, which is aggressively buying up municipal water systems, a sense for the politics in each locale is also highly valued. To that end, the company has eight to 10 corporate development people covering the 13 states in which it operates, plus three to four additional staff at its headquarters in Bryn Mawr, Pa. "It's a lean department," he says, "but we form teams as deals arise, tapping local experts to work on them." -- Christine Idzelis
A Goldman guy turned Cisco Kid
Heading up the most active dealmaking unit at one of the most active and successful technology acquirers has got to be one of the coolest jobs in corporate dealmaking. It's a fact not lost on Charles Carmel. As senior director, corporate business development at Cisco Systems Inc., he directs the corporate development unit that oversees many of the company's most important markets, including the consumer and service provider sectors and digital media, security, wireless and unified communications technologies. "As one person working in a large company, it's pretty unique to have an impact on an entire industry," Carmel says. "When we get it right, we can change the direction of an entire market."
Many of the deals led by Carmel have indeed been groundbreaking, starting with the 2003 purchase of home networking equipment maker Linksys Group Inc. for $500 million, which marked Cisco's first departure from the enterprise and service provider market and into the consumer market. He also led the networking equipment maker's efforts to buy set-top box maker Scientific-Atlanta Inc. for $6.9 billion and WebEx Communications Inc., a maker of conferencing technology, for $3.2 billion earlier this year.
Before arriving at Cisco, Carmel spent three years working on technology deals with Goldman, Sachs & Co., then started an M.B.A. program at Stanford University that led to a summer internship at Cisco in 2000. He was hired full-time as senior vice president for strategy and corporate development that September. The switch from banking to dealmaking at Cisco has allowed Carmel to get more deeply involved in strategy as well as presenting a few obstacles. "Cisco has lots of different stakeholders, and it's sometimes challenging when you have your own vision of the right way to push a strategy. You have to take into account the internal and external elements. Its not a lone-bandit kind of job." -- Olaf de Senerpont Domis
In vino veritas -- and a varied career
Paul Hetterich, executive vice president for business development and corporate strategy at Constellation Brands Inc., has played many different corporate roles in his career. The one constant has been wine. After graduating with a degree in business administration from Le Moyne College in Syracuse, N.Y., Hetterich landed a job selling wine for Wine Merchants Ltd. A few years later, he moved into product development for Canandaigua, N.Y.-based Widmer Wine Cellars, acquired in 1986 by Canandaigua Wine Co., which in 2000 was renamed Constellation Brands Inc. At Constellation, the world's largest wine company, Hetterich has worked in a variety of departments, from product marketing to brand management to business administration.
"Constellation, going back to its roots of Canandaigua Wine Co., was always acquisitive," he says. "So exposure to facets of acquisitions goes back to my marketing roles." Besides, growing in-house means he's gained an "intimate knowledge about the company's culture, values, and structure." Hetterich became SVP of corporate development in 2001 and led a number of major transactions, including the formation of the Pacific Wine Partners venture with BRL Hardy Ltd. in 2001. In 2003 he was promoted to EVP of business development and corporate strategy, leading an eight-person team that among other deals negotiated the purchases of Robert Mondavi Corp. in 2004 for $1.03 billion and Vincor International Inc., Canada's largest wine company, for $1.31 billion in 2006. Strategy plays an increasingly important role for the corporate dealmaker, says Hetterich, especially as the industry becomes more competitive. "Our group has always been involved, but as Constellation Brands has become larger, the stakes become larger and there is little room, nor tolerance, for error." -- Amy Wu
Coming home to corporate dealmaking
Richard Walker, senior vice president of corporate development at Colorado-based IHS Inc., is a native of the Denver area. And though he has spent years bouncing around the country, Colorado keeps luring him back. After a four-year, post-collegiate (University of Colorado) stint in accounting with Arthur Andersen LLP in Atlanta, Walker returned to Denver in 1991, earned his M.B.A. through the University of Denver's executive program and then signed on with regional Bell US West Inc., moving from operations to marketing to investor relations before landing in corporate development.
When US West paid $12 billion for Continental Cablevision Inc. in 1996 and split its fixed-line and mobile-cable groups, Walker went to Boston with the latter, which became MediaOne Group Inc. He was eventually routed back to Denver and stayed on board until Media- One's $44 billion sale to AT&T Corp. in June 2000. Of those megadeals, Walker says: "I had a role," but he says the important thing for him was the opportunity to work with M&A mentors, something he deems an essential part of becoming a corporate dealmaker.
Walker went on to test the private equity waters and later operations with online car seller Autobytel Inc., spending three years commuting to California before taking his leave to spend time with his four daughters and enjoy Colorado's year-round riches, like skiing, biking and golfing. "In that period of reflection," he says, he kept returning to one conclusion. "I really enjoy creating value through M&A."
Up popped an opportunity with Englewood, Colo.-based technical information provider IHS Inc. Reporting to IHS CFO Mike Sullivan, Walker leads a four-man team--which has closed six deals since he joined in December--charged with evaluating and pursuing M&A activity companywide. "The big ones are a lot of fun," he says. "But it's the smaller transactions where you really learn M&A and you really learn where value is created or destroyed." -- Carolyn Murphy
From softwear to software
Alex Lintner's path to his post as senior vice president, strategy and corporate development at Intuit Inc. was paved with a little serendipity, a lot of non-technology-related consulting work and a great deal of sexy lingerie. Before joining Intuit two years ago, Lintner was a vice president and director of the Boston Consulting Group's West Coast consumer practice, where he helped transform Victoria's Secret Stores Inc. into the largest retailer of intimate apparel. When Intuit signed on as a BCG client, Lintner became the company's consultant, in large part because he was one of the few partners who hadn't done work for Microsoft Corp., the firm's largest client.
After two years, Intuit hired Lintner as senior vice president of strategy and corporate development, overseeing a team of 39 and reporting to chief executive Steve Bennett. In engineering the $1.35 billion acquisition of online banking service provider Digital Insight Corp. in February, he showed how a company like Intuit can use its top-selling products--in its case, Quicken--as a springboard to growth.
Not that the strategy works every time. Intuit's plan to get into payments processing to round out its small-business accounting offerings was put on hold in December, when its $142 million deal for Electronic Clearing House Inc. fell through. Intuit killed the deal after the target became part of a federal investigation into online gambling, triggering a material adverse change clause. "That was certainly a disappointment, because we believe very much in payments processing for credit and debit cards, and we want to acquire these opportunities," Lintner says. He and Intuit aren't about to give up. "We will announce a deal before the end of the year," he says. -- Olaf de Senerpont Domis
'You need to be able to park the legal degree'
Chris Dewees tread a common path into corporate development. Before being named senior vice president, corporate development, at communications equipment maker JDS Uniphase Corp., he worked as an attorney, first at Morrison & Foerster LLP and later as corporate counsel at JDSU, which he joined in 1999. In 2002, he was promoted to general counsel. He says the legal background comes in handy when negotiating deals, but that it must be balanced with people skills and business savvy. "You have to be a very business-focused attorney in this line of work," he says. "You need to be able to park the legal degree."
Dewees has seen JDSU fall from a high-flying optical equipment maker that got caught up in the 1990s bubble to a down-and-out company in need of a turnaround and, more recently, to a company that is growing again. In the boom times, JDSU acquired as many as 15 companies in a single year. Although it makes fewer purchases these days, acquisitions remain central to its ongoing turnaround strategy. "Over two years, I've seen more transformation than many people see in a career," says Dewees. Key to JDSU's return to growth was its acquisition of Acterna Inc. in 2005, which brought it entrée into a new business selling testing equipment used in the installation of optical networking gear.
Dewees attributes the success of his corporate development team in part to the group's diversity. The staff includes a few "gregarious, extroverted types," as well as some more technologically savvy people to facilitate technical reviews, and sales and marketing types who may rotate out of his department and into senior roles at one of the company's business units. "Corporate development is a highly desirable place for people who have been with the company for a while and are looking for something different," he says. "I get a lot of inquiries." -- Andrea Orr
A Goldman guy turned Cisco Kid
Heading up the most active dealmaking unit at one of the most active and successful technology acquirers has got to be one of the coolest jobs in corporate dealmaking. It's a fact not lost on Charles Carmel. As senior director, corporate business development at Cisco Systems Inc., he directs the corporate development unit that oversees many of the company's most important markets, including the consumer and service provider sectors and digital media, security, wireless and unified communications technologies. "As one person working in a large company, it's pretty unique to have an impact on an entire industry," Carmel says. "When we get it right, we can change the direction of an entire market."
Many of the deals led by Carmel have indeed been groundbreaking, starting with the 2003 purchase of home networking equipment maker Linksys Group Inc. for $500 million, which marked Cisco's first departure from the enterprise and service provider market and into the consumer market. He also led the networking equipment maker's efforts to buy set-top box maker Scientific-Atlanta Inc. for $6.9 billion and WebEx Communications Inc., a maker of conferencing technology, for $3.2 billion earlier this year.
Before arriving at Cisco, Carmel spent three years working on technology deals with Goldman, Sachs & Co., then started an M.B.A. program at Stanford University that led to a summer internship at Cisco in 2000. He was hired full-time as senior vice president for strategy and corporate development that September. The switch from banking to dealmaking at Cisco has allowed Carmel to get more deeply involved in strategy as well as presenting a few obstacles. "Cisco has lots of different stakeholders, and it's sometimes challenging when you have your own vision of the right way to push a strategy. You have to take into account the internal and external elements. Its not a lone-bandit kind of job." -- Olaf de Senerpont Domis
Engineering M&A and communications, too
Barry M. Abzug, senior vice president for corporate development at Iowa-based aerospace firm Rockwell Collins Inc., boasts three engineering degrees, including a Ph.D. But he says he has always been trending toward his current role. "Even early in my career, I was almost always on the border between the technical world and the business world, working with marketing folks on how to define new products and services for customers," Abzug says. "I have always been a concept guy and a future-looking guy, and not a design-detail guy."
Abzug rose through the ranks at the engineering and manufacturing provider ITT Corp. before joining Rockwell Collins in 2001, just as it was being spun out of Rockwell International Corp. He had little direct experience doing deals at the time.
"When Rockwell Collins put me into this position, they were much more interested in someone with strategic background than someone with detailed nuts-and-bolts experience with acquisitions," Abzug says. "They said, 'We believe you can learn the M&A talk, but what we need is someone who can chart our strategy.' " His 65-person department manages not only M&A and strategy tasks but investor relations, advertising and public relations as well. "When I came in the door, our CEO said, 'I want to know there is one place where it all comes together in terms of our communications with all constituents,' and that is our role."
Abzug oversees one to two transactions a year but says his biggest career highlight to date came during his time as an engineer. Early work he did developing speech compression algorithms found its way into Texas Instruments Inc.'s Speak and Spell toy.
"It is certainly the part of my career my kids talk about," he says. -- Lou Whiteman
Join Corporate Dealmaker's LinkedIn forum

|