The Deal
Monday, November 23, 
10:05 pm

Grape Expectations

[ Share ]  [ E-mail ]  [ Leave a Comment ]
PaulHetterichBig,jpg.png Paul Hetterich, executive vice president for business development and corporate strategy at the world's largest winemaker by volume, is a busy man. Among other things Hetterich (pictured) oversees mergers, acquisitions and divestiture initiatives at Fairport, N.Y.-based Constellation Brands Inc., whose 300-strong portfolio includes Robert Mondavi wines, Corona beer and Svedka vodka. The LeMoyne College graduate has been with the firm since 1986, working his way up from assistant product manager in marketing of what was then Canandaigua Wine Co. to his current position in June 2003. He shares his thoughts about the changing face of Constellation and the world wine industry with The Deal's Renée Cordes.

Recently Constellation has been a net seller rather than a net acquirer of wine brands. What is the rationale behind the current strategy?


In the Almaden and Inglenook divestiture scenario these wines are in a lower "popular" price segment that has been declining for years. As we have seen U.S. consumers become better educated about wines, and their palates become more sophisticated, we also see them continue to trade up to better wines. Strategically, our emphasis is on the premium and above segments. The sale of Inglenook and Almaden [in February 2008] monetized assets and provided us with cash to help us reduce borrowings. For the more recent scenario [June 2008] in which we sold eight wine brands and other wine assets in California and the Pacific Northwest (Atlas Peak, Geyser Peak, Gary Farrell, Buena Vista, Columbia, Ste. Chapelle, etc.), these were predominantly labels that were considered to be redundant with others in our portfolio. Again, we turned these assets into liquidity that helped us reduce borrowings. We continuously assess the viability of our assets with a focus on always maximizing long-term profitable growth, returns and value.

What is the most important criterion in seeking a buyer for your assets?

Ensuring the buyer's ability to conclude the transaction with Constellation to the mutual benefit of both parties as efficiently as possible. What is the time frame foreseen for the planned Australian asset sale announced in August, and what level of interest do you expect? Due the nature of the sales -- mostly vineyards and facilities -- we have engaged real estate firms to find suitable buyers. Most of the product being eliminated comes in the form of discontinued SKUs [stock-keeping units] as part of an overall product rationalization initiative associated with the repositioning of our Australian wine business. The timetable for selling Australian assets is flexible. We do not intend to rush the requisite changes that need to be made to handle our ongoing business. This is a significant change, and we will not unduly rush its implementation.

When does Constellation expect to start making acquisitions in the wine sector again, or is this not in the cards for the near future?

Our long-term growth strategy relies upon a combination of both organic growth from our existing portfolio, and strategic acquisitions. We do not speculate regarding future potential acquisitions.

How would you describe Constellation's general approach to acquisitions, be it in wine or other industries?

Acquisitions must be strategic in nature, meaning they should complement our existing business and provide long-term growth potential, solid ROIC [return on invested capital] and help us generate superior long-term value. They should also further our efforts to move our portfolio toward the premium and above price segments, which is where consumers are gravitating in our major markets.

What are the main drivers of deal activity in the global wine sector, and will this trend continue?

International consolidation. The move toward greater scale by suppliers is being necessitated by consolidation in both the on-premise and off-premise retail sectors in our key markets. Additionally, in the United States there continues to be consolidation among distributors. To remain a competitive, top-tier supplier, we must be able to provide our customers with consumer preferred brands from a variety of growing regions (for wine), or key brands in hot categories (spirits).

How much pressure is there on industry players to innovate?

There will always be a need to create new brands as a percentage of a portfolio as large as ours. Some are designed to be in the market for a relatively short period of time. Some are introduced to create or take advantage of consumer trends. Yet others are developed to determine demand and to see if they have longer-term viability. Regarding the need for innovation, that will never end and comes in the form of new packaging, new and creative ways to market products, consumer-driven emphasis such as "green initiatives" and flavored spirits such as vodka, schnapps and others, and the science/technology associated with wine and spirits production. However, consumers also desire established brands they know and trust and there will always be a market for those products as well.

What is the target consumer group for new brands such as Twin Fin, Monkey Bay and 3 Blind Moose, and how do you explain their success?

We have conducted extensive consumer research in the U.S. and U.K. in the past two years or so, and have discovered there are numerous categories of consumers. In the U.S., we know there is currently a large "baby boom" population with significant discretionary income. Their purchasing habits are somewhat different than the so-called millennial generation that has come into legal drinking age during the past eight years. We also have found that consumers like variety and value, and that they are drinking across categories. Where someone may have been loyal to a specific scotch whiskey 30 years ago, and that's all they drank when they had an alcohol beverage, now we see people who are drinking a beer at a baseball game in the afternoon, having a cocktail prior to dinner, a glass of wine with dinner and a cordial liqueur after dinner. The success of any of our brands is because we have been able to somehow connect with consumers and they try, like, recommend and repeatedly buy our brands.

Join Corporate Dealmaker's LinkedIn forum

Comments
Post a comment


Search


Search For

Corporate Dealmaker Video


Deal Economy 2010: Morgan Stanley's Smith Barney integration

Morgan Stanley's Rosenthal on the nitty gritty details of the Smith Barney integration.
Decade of The Deal


Movers & Shakers


Juergen Lasowski
Onyx Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Edward Swallow
Northrop Grumman Corp.

Owen Mahoney
Outspark

Alice Kim
FLO TV Inc.

Eric Hausler
Isle of Capri Casinos Inc.
Juergen Lasowski, Onyx Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Edward Swallow, Northrop Grumman Corp.
Owen Mahoney, Outspark
Alice Kim, FLO TV Inc.
Eric Hausler, Isle of Capri Casinos Inc.


COMPLETE MOVERS & SHAKERS ARCHIVES

The Magazine


MACDdec1cover.gifAnd the winners are...
Even in a period when things like toxic credit default swaps and noxious structured investment vehicles dominate the conversation in many parts of the deal community, people are still willing to take the time to recognize skill and achievement in the strategic transactions that help those companies adapt and grow.
View the complete issue


Last Issue
Archives
Suggest a topic
Purchase a reprint
Subscribe to The Deal


Monthly Archives


Syndicate

Contributors

footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg


©Copyright 2009, The Deal, LLC. All rights reserved. Please send all technical questions, comments or concerns to the Webmaster.