The Deal
Sunday, November 8, 
6:18 am

Tishman Speyer haunted by tenants

  Share     E-Mail    Discussion    Print Story

The proceeds from the largest real estate deal ever could become smaller based on the outcome of a recent lawsuit filed by a group of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village tenants in New York State Supreme Court against MetLife and Tishman Speyer.

MetLife agreed to sell the sprawling enclave of 110-residential buildings for $5.4 billion to Tishman Speyer and Black Rock Realty on October 2006. But now a group of tenants have filed a class action lawsuit Jan. 22 that alleges MetLife had illegally charged market-rate rents for more than 3,000 apartments in the Manhattan complexes, according to a New York Times report. The tenants also say that MetLife received tax breaks since 1992 under the city’s J-51 property tax program, which, they say, prohibits a property owner from removing apartments from rent regulation.

The lawsuit intends to correct the alleged inflated rents at Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village. It also seeks a formal declaration that the 3,000 or so market rate apartments remain subject to rent regulation at least until the tax breaks expire, in 2017 or 2018. The suit also asks for $320 million in damages, or three times the rent overcharges for the past two years, as calculated by the plaintiffs.

It is true that MetLife had made a concerted effort since the late 1990s to drastically improve its units and push the costs onto existing tenants via higher rents. Rents, which reach the $2000 threshold, are considered deregulated and can be leased for a market rent to the next tenant. Market rate one-bedroom apartments can be fetched for at least $2800 and two bedrooms at $4000 per month. Since going public in 2000, MetLife's strategy to maximize its earnings from Stuyvesant Town/Peter Cooper had also included leasing apartments to NYU students and closing its list for rent-stabilized apartments.

The repercussions of the tenants winning the suit would probably cost MetLife 6% of the sale price. In addition, Tishman Speyer and its partner, BlackRock Realty, would not be able to raise rents as quickly as they would have believed before the suit.

For now, Tishman Speyer says the suit has no merit but the courts will be the true judge of that ... — Gerald Magpily

 

See New York Times article (registration required - available for limited time)
See Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village Deal Watch

Continue reading below

Also on Dealscape





Post a comment





The Deal Pipeline

Deal Video


Inside The Deal: Linklaters' Schmidt says how regulators handled Pfizer Inc.'s acquisition of Wyeth is an outlier of how others merger reviews will be conducted.


More video...

Crisis On Wall Street
Technology
Deals of The Decade

Community

Industry Insight

Dealing with frozen bank lending

If your bank is not willing to lend, what can you do as your company continues to seek growth?


Judgment Call

The coming age of the renminbi

The Chinese currency will play an increasingly important role in international commerce and finance.


Industry Insight

Banking on PE investments

Howls of protest greeted the FDIC policy statement, but the financial services industry should get over it.


footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg


©Copyright 2009, The Deal, LLC. All rights reserved. Please send all technical questions, comments or concerns to the Webmaster.