| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 GETTING TO KNOW NET NEUTRALITY After last year's Republican-controlled Congress killed amendments to preserve so-called Network Neutrality, the advocacy groups of Internet companies had hoped for better luck with the current Democratic-led Congress but have thus far seen no meaningful legislation introduced.
After last year's Republican-controlled Congress killed amendments to preserve so-called Network Neutrality, the advocacy groups of Internet companies had hoped for better luck with the current Democratic-led Congress but have thus far seen no meaningful legislation introduced. Network Neutrality -- the concept that major telecoms should provide equal access to all content providers as opposed to creating fast lanes for their own services and others willing to pay top dollar while charging other competitors exorbitantly high prices -- has been left on the back burner by Congress for a number of reasons, blogs CNet's Declan McCullagh. Unfortunately for advocates of Net Neutrality, agencies under the Executive Branch have not been quiet. The Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice have both came out against new rules to ensure broadband competition. In a comparison sure to be sending chills to Internet companies, the DOJ's filing with the FCC on Sept. 7 compared a tiered pricing model by cable and telecom services to the postal service's charging premium prices for faster service. The DOJ's statement says, "It may make economic sense for content providers who want a higher quality of service to pay for the Internet upgrades necessary to provide such service." The DOJ also says that "any regulation that prohibits this type of pricing may leave broadband providers unable to raise the capital necessary to fund these investments." Net Neutrality's setbacks began in June, when the FTC also warned against new regulations or legislation, saying, "In the absence of significant market failure or demonstrated consumer harm, policy makers should be particularly hesitant to enact new regulation in this area." While both the FTC and DOJ cited their willingness to step in should service providers go too far and hurt consumers, promoters of Net Neutrality, such as the Open Internet Coalition, insist that pre-emptive safeguards are needed. THE ARGUMENTS ...
... AND THE IMPACT Net Neutrality was central to the approval of the SBC Communications Inc.-AT&T Corp. and Verizon Communications Inc.-MCI Inc. deals last year -- they had to agree to it. Net Neutrality's effect on technology development and adoption of Web services by businesses and consumers will likely be far greater in the future, but with the expected tight battle for the White House, a political and regulatory debate on an issue that many don't quite understand and that isn't of pressing importance may be put on hold. The regulatory issues of Net Neutrality and their effect on M&A will be the focus of an afternoon panel at Tech Confidential's Convergence 2.0 Conference on Sept. 17 in New York City. --Carolyn Murphy and George White UP IN ARMS
Categories Deal Video
    Community
 Elsewhere on The Deal.comDealwatchThe Deal MagazineCorporate Dealmaker
The Deal VideoCategories
Blog roll
Archives
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
