The Deal
Sunday, November 8, 
6:37 am

Pay-to-play or no way

  Share     E-Mail    Discussion    Print Story
jmelmed.jpgDeal contributors Jonathan M.A. Melmed (left) and J. Allen Miller, Chadbourne & Parke LLP private equity transactions partners, take up the comeback of the "pay-to-play" provision in a Judgment Call item Tuesday -- the contractual obligation that forces investors to put additional money into existing portfolio companies, or else, and one that enjoyed its heyday after the 2001 bubble implosion.



Continue reading below

Also on Dealscape

amiller.jpg"The justification for pay-to-play provisions is that in a difficult capital-raising environment such provisions are necessary to raise capital and, in some cases avoid bankruptcy," they write. "In the current economic climate, such provisions have been reappearing with significant consequences for the unwary."

Given the resurgence, a quick refresher is in order. Melmed and Miller (right) remind us that provisions vary by contract, but all say that investors must participate on a pro-rata basis in follow-on funding rounds, while consequences of failing to do so include losing liquidation preferences or board seats or the conversion of preferred stock into common stock.

By example, the column addresses the formal approach the Delaware courts have taken via WatchMark Corp. v. Argo Global Capital and Benchmark Capital Partners IV LP v. Vague, focusing on procedural fairness and contract construction rather than equitable arguments and notions of fiduciary duty owed early-round minority investors.

Melmed and Miller also offer advice on how companies should best protect their interests, like appointing an independent committee of directors to advise on valuation and mind of stockholders' best interests, and provisions like early-round preferred stockholders' certificates of designation calling for the conversion of the preferred stock into common stock only upon a majority class-based vote, not a series-based vote. And investors, they write, should, if possible, set aside enough in reserves for additional rounds at the time of a first investment, and from a legal perspective, focus on the absence procedural protections. - Carolyn Murphy

Read the full atricle on TheDeal.com




Post a comment





The Deal Pipeline

Deal Video


Inside The Deal: Linklaters' Schmidt says how regulators handled Pfizer Inc.'s acquisition of Wyeth is an outlier of how others merger reviews will be conducted.


More video...

Crisis On Wall Street
Technology
Deals of The Decade

Community

Industry Insight

Dealing with frozen bank lending

If your bank is not willing to lend, what can you do as your company continues to seek growth?


Judgment Call

The coming age of the renminbi

The Chinese currency will play an increasingly important role in international commerce and finance.


Industry Insight

Banking on PE investments

Howls of protest greeted the FDIC policy statement, but the financial services industry should get over it.


footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg


©Copyright 2009, The Deal, LLC. All rights reserved. Please send all technical questions, comments or concerns to the Webmaster.