| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
VCs pumped a record $3 billion into 221 cleantech deals in 2007 a 43% increase in dollars over 2006, according to new data out Feb. 29 from Dow Jones' VentureSource. The U.S. accounted for 83% of this investment. Cleantech startups attracted 8% of all U.S. venture investment. Industry watchers in late January said they expected VCs would remain bullish on cleantech even if the U.S. slid into recession.
As Cascadia Capital LLC's CEO Michael Butler noted, solar is still hot, while companies focused on advanced materials for energy efficiency and technological improvements for biofuels. And a recession may actually help drive cleantech M&A, according to Cascadia managing director Ted Bernhard. "A lot of the M&A activity is actually, in part, driven by negative economics in these projects," he noted. "I think a recession would probably actually increase the amount of activity and consolidation that we see in the sector." Further, he says, in green building and energy efficiency sectors, there are economic benefits for companies, so startups in this arena look positioned to do well. Interesting bets of late include:
LOOKING AHEAD Going into 2008, VCs expected cleantech to remain a super-hot sector, according to a survey released Dec. 17 from the National Venture Capital Association, which also compiles data on venture investing, though investors did express concern over continued high valuations. On investment growth in venture capital overall, The Deal's George White noted:
And as investment has grown, cleantech's definition has also broadened beyond just alternative energy bets. As Cliff Carlsen noted Dec. 17: "Investors believe the development of new materials with raw ingredients and distribution models that all address environmental issues may be the next big movement." Recent bets, he noted, included: Foundation Capital leading a $50 million Series B for Serious Materials LLC, a company building plants to produce more eco-friendly drywall; and NGEN Partners LLC's $180 million fund raised in 2006 dedicated for environmentally friendly products, one of which is Hycrete Inc., which makes a concrete mix additive to improve structural fortitude and durability. Meanwhile, cleantech venture investing had already hit a record high in 2007, according to data out Nov. 28 from Thomson Financial and the NVCA, as U.S. venture firms poured $2.6 billion into 168 cleantech deals in the first nine months of the year. The year-to-date total is already 46% more by dollar volume than all of 2006 and the highest dollar volume ever, the report said. While the three largest cleantech deals by U.S. firms in the first three quarters of 2007 according to NVCA data were in overseas companies, California, Massachusetts and Texas unsurprisingly roped in the most dollars and deals stateside, while solar energy saw the most activity by subsector. The largest funding for a U.S. company, the report said, came in two rounds totaling $115 million for GreatPoint Energy Inc. of Cambridge, Mass., which converts coals, petroleum coke and biomass into clean natural gas, from Citigroup Inc.'s Sustainable Development Investments unit, AES Corp., Suncor Energy Inc., Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, Draper Fisher Jurvetson, Dow Chemical Co., Advanced Technology Ventures, Khosla Ventures and others. The most active U.S. investors this year have been Khosla, DFJ and Kleiner Perkins, the report said. But will the reward merit the risk down the road? All bets are on. SEARCHING FOR POWER The NVCA report came a day after Google Inc. unveiled plans for an initiative run through its Google.org philanthropy arm to generate a gigawatt of renewable energy cheaper than electricity from a coal-fired plant. The company said it would commit up to "hundreds of millions" of dollars to bring new technologies to market and is working with eSolar Inc. on its solar thermal power initiative and has invested in wind power company Makini Power. (See more on Google's green building initiatives below.) While cleantech is still just a few watts of the venture capital power supply, the sector is growing, and more significantly, it continues to channel significant financing rounds. Other recent deals include:
For the second quarter of 2007, the largest venture funding across sectors was a $73 million round for Advent Solar Inc., according to the MoneyTree report from PricewaterhouseCoopers and the National Venture Capital Association based on data from Thomson Financial. The funding bolstered total investment in cleantech to $451 million in 44 fundings for the second three months of 2007. In late July, Palo Alto, Calif., venture firm Technology Partners announced raising a $300 million new fund -- to be split evenly between cleantech and life sciences. Also in July, solar panel developer Solaria Corp. raised $50 million in a Series C round of funding led by German strategic partner Q-Cells AG to finance construction of a manufacturing plant with a Philippine partner. All the hype and investor interest has led to the term "greenwashing," The Deal's Andrea Orr wrote in October, where things sound eco-friendly, but in reality aren't as green as they purport to be:
And as the fervor continues, The Deal's David Shabelman pointed out in July, despite a common perception to the contrary, VCs are proceeding with caution in cleantech investing.
WHAT TO WATCH So what's hot? Everything, Heller Ehrman LLP's co-chair of energy and cleantech, Alison Freeman-Gleason, told The Deal's Claire Poole in June. More specifically, biofuels made from biowaste, solar projects and renewable portfolio standards, or the requirement on energy companies to generate a certain percentage of power with renewable sources, while those that have tanked or are on their way, she says, include hydrogen and overly hyped ethanol, which won't necessarily solve all the problems it portends to. And what's ahead, she says, is the emergence of more clean coal technologies. In April, The Deal's Stacey Higginbotham gives a rundown of the well-funded startups and their lofty expectations:
Indeed, venture investing alone won't do the trick in fast-changing renewable and cleantech markets. But VC with private equity, or even project finance, with just a little help from the government, may suffice, The Deal's Cliff Carlsen pointed out. THE CRAPSHOOT Investors are taking chances across the board and focusing now on what one referred to as "the deep-science plays." Higginbotham in April ranked five technologies expected to take hold according to their near-term commercialization potential and the startups to watch.
EXECUTIVE ORDERS President George W. Bush gave cleantech a considerable nod during his State of the Union address in January:
While he has tackled topics like reducing U.S. dependence on oil, foreign and otherwise, and alternative energy in all six of his previous State of the Union addresses, he has also laid out an aggressive goal -- to reduce gasoline use by 20% over the next 10 years -- a task only achievable through the use of alternative fuels. But some large oil and utility companies are falling short in adopting cleantech, Poole points out. WISHING ON A STAR VCs, however, are unfazed. Investors like Vinod Khosla, who has built an entire portfolio of renewable energy startups, are often cited for their commitment to the sector, but The Deal's Mary Flynn examines some other notables:
SUNNY OPTIMISM VCs have warmed to startups focused on solar power and seen reinforcement through projects like Google Inc.'s to build the largest solar-powered office complex in the U.S. The search giant enlisted Energy Innovations Inc.'s Pasadena, Calif.-based systems integration arm, EI Solutions Inc., to build its new headquarters.
But with such aggressive investment, some advocate caution. "The VCs are still early on in their education curve, and there are a lot of new entrants to the marketplace that are making investments based on generalized knowledge of the sectors, rather than experience with the individual technologies themselves," Ted Bernhard, a Portland, Ore.-based VC-turned-attorney said in January. "You don't have a lot of VCs that came from one of these companies themselves that have, all of a sudden, jumped over to the VC world like you did in the software and hardware arena." He said some VCs might not be focusing on investments that can yield venture-level returns and that, instead, the focus really needs to be on early-stage technologies that will be ready for large-scale deployment a few years down the road.--Carolyn Murphy
CategoriesComments![]() Deal Video
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Community
![]() Elsewhere on The Deal.comDealwatchThe Deal MagazineCorporate Dealmaker
The Deal VideoCategories
Blog roll
Archives
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Going Green Includes Reducing Truck Emissions to Service Facilities
There is one area of the Green Technology Industry that is not being addressed. It is waste collection. There is new Technology that dramatically reduces truck emissions by reducing visits by the waste hauler.
Packaderm Equipment is searching for investors to aggressively take this technology to the North American market. The potential business is enormous.
“Roll-Pack” Technology is the only system that reduces the volume of waste in 20, 30, 40 & 50 cubic-yard open-bin containers. Customers should expect a minimum of a 4 to 1 compaction ratio with general waste, which means that their bins will only need to be picked up 25% of their current # of hauls. Reducing trips to the landfill reduces emissions, hauling costs and wear-and-tear on trucks and roadways.
Companies that manage multi-tenant industrial facilities can consolidate waste from all tenants at an on-site location where the Mammoth can compact all waste for the facility. Rather than haulers driving throughout the facility to pick up waste for each tenant weekly, the hauler would pickup one open bin for the entire facility once a month. Compacting waste for single or multi-tenants would reduce waste costs, reduce emissions and reduce wear-and-tear on parking surfaces.
Waste haulers must understand that they can still be profitable by reducing their overhead while reducing emissions. With this system, waste companies can charge customers the same rate (or less) since the amount of waste being picked up will not change. However, the visits will be far less. With fewer visits, the customer experiences less on-site emissions, less noise pollution and less wear-and-tear on their parking surfaces. With fewer visits, the hauler can service additional accounts or reduce its fleet. Everyone wins.
Compacting waste in open-top roll-off bins is much more efficient than existing compaction systems. Existing compaction systems require that the bin be returned to the customer, whereas open bins are interchangeable and do not need to be returned. Open bins are exchanged at time of pick up. Therefore, the carbon footprint is decreased by an additioanl 50% than the most efficient existing systems that are now in place.
See what the buzz is all about. Watch the Mammoth in action at http://www.packadermequipment.com/equipment.htm
If interested, please respond by email or phone (8am-5pm Pacific Time)
Sincerely,
William Drenik
President/CEO
Tel 253-549-7980
Email: wdrenik@packadermequipment.com
Website: www.packadermequipment.com