Let me offer a minor historical quibble about a New York Times Sunday business story on Bear Stearns Cos. In an attempt to give Bear some company in the outer boroughs, the Times describes Lehman Brothers Inc. as another "scrappy" firm, in contrast to those white-shoe types at, say, Morgan Stanley. Well, that's a big boo-boo.
Continue reading below
Lehman was for much of its history pretty white shoe, run by top-drawer investment bankers from Bobbie Lehman, whose brother Herbert Lehman was a banker there and later governor of New York, to Pete Peterson. Lehman and Kuhn, Loeb & Co., which merged in 1977, in fact, were the "Jewish" analogue (German-Jewish, in fact, as recounted in Stephen Birmingham's "Our Crowd") to the old J.P. Morgan & Co., with powerful client lists and relationships. Only in the '80s, with the rise of a powerful trading franchise under Lewis Glucksman did Lehman begin to effectively diversify beyond traditional investment banking. The resulting archetypical clash between banking and trading, famously chronicled in Ken Auletta's "Greed and Glory on Wall Street," sent bankers like Peterson and Steve Schwarzman into exile, eventually to form Blackstone Group LP and provoked the disastrous merger of Lehman with American Express Co.
These cultural stories are always tricky. Arguably, the vaunted Goldman, Sachs & Co. was, historically, scrappier and more outer borough (meaning Eastern European Jewish by pedigree) than Kuhn Loeb or Lehman. But all these firms did business with each other, and there are exceptions to every cultural stereotype, which is the reason they're stereotypes. - Robert Teitelman