The Deal
Sunday, November 8, 
12:53 pm

CtW wins some, loses some, but wants more from WaMu

  Share     E-Mail    Discussion    Print Story

wamu.gifA large activist labor-backed institutional investor just isn't satisfied with Washington Mutual Inc.'s Kerry Killinger's decision to step down as board chairman at the country's largest savings and loan. CtW Investment Group, an organization that advises pensions for unions belonging to the Change to Win labor group, wants more.

Continue reading below

Also on Dealscape

Sure, CtW is excited that Killinger announced Monday that he will resign from his chairmanship position -- though he remains at WaMu as CEO. And it's also happy that WaMu director Mary Pugh, president of investment firm Pugh Capital Management, resigned from the WaMu board in April. But, it is still peeved that two directors on the WaMu board, James Stever and Charles M. Lillis, remain on the board. Both WaMu directors had been the target of a "just vote no" campaign orchestrated by the labor union fund.

At the WaMu annual meeting April 15, company tallies showed that 41% of shareholders opposed Stever's renomination, and 41% opposed Charles M. Lillis, a director who was targeted by another union-backed pension fund. But CtW, estimated that by counting only votes of actual shareholders, the tally for removing 50.9% for Stever and 51.2% for Lillis.

"The vote to name an independent chairman excluded uninstructed broker votes, but the disputed re-election of directors James H. Stever and Charles Lillis may have resulted from the inclusion of these phantom votes," said CtW Investment Group research director Richard Clayton in a statement. "The board needs to disclose whether Stever and Lillis received a majority of votes cast by shareholders and to request the resignation of any director who did not."

CtW asserts that Lillis and Stever were put over the top because of so-called broker nonvotes, also known as broker discretionary votes. For clients who never indicate how to vote their shares, stockbrokers are permitted to cast ballots for them in "routine matters," such as uncontested director elections, as the brokers see fit. Critics deride this practice as corporate ballot stuffing, because brokers typically back management initiatives. For CtW, the broker-nonvote issue is particularly relevant because WaMu has a majority vote policy in its corporate governance guidelines. - Ron Orol

See CtW Investment Group press release
See Dealscape: CtW declares WaMu victory, turns up the heat

Ron Orol is a Washington-based reporter for The Deal and author of Extreme Value Hedging: How Activist Hedge Fund Managers Are Taking on the World.





Post a comment





The Deal Pipeline

Deal Video


Inside The Deal: Linklaters' Schmidt says how regulators handled Pfizer Inc.'s acquisition of Wyeth is an outlier of how others merger reviews will be conducted.


More video...

Crisis On Wall Street
Technology
Deals of The Decade

Community

Industry Insight

Dealing with frozen bank lending

If your bank is not willing to lend, what can you do as your company continues to seek growth?


Judgment Call

The coming age of the renminbi

The Chinese currency will play an increasingly important role in international commerce and finance.


Industry Insight

Banking on PE investments

Howls of protest greeted the FDIC policy statement, but the financial services industry should get over it.


footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg


©Copyright 2009, The Deal, LLC. All rights reserved. Please send all technical questions, comments or concerns to the Webmaster.