The Deal
Saturday, November 21, 
4:57 pm

In Whole Foods trial, FTC aims to keep ALJ moving

  Share     E-Mail    Discussion    Print Story
The Federal Trade Commission is trying a new tack in its attempt to blow up Whole Foods Market Inc.'s year-old $700 million acquisition of Wild Oats Markets Inc.

Continue reading below

Also on Dealscape

The FTC, which has been experimenting with ways to speed its slow in-house "Part 3" merger challenges, is using its revived case against Whole Foods to light a fire under its administrative law judges, or ALJs. Commissioner Tom Rosch is currently slated to preside over a Sept. 8 hearing to set a schedule for the case but, according to lawyers closely watching the case, he'll step aside and allow one of the commission's designated ALJs, to actually conduct the trial.

To some degree that would probably please Whole Foods' legal team, lead by Paul Denis at Dechert LLP. Denis's team on Aug. 22 filed a request for Rosch to recuse himself as ALJ. The unorthodox notion of appointing a sitting commissioner to act as ALJ was set up for the FTC's recent case against a northern Virginia hospital merger but the parties canceled the deal before that proceeding got underway.

The purpose of Rosch setting the trial schedule would be to make sure the Whole Foods case proceeds at a rapid clip. But it's not clear how much leeway the ALJ would have to adjust Rosch's schedule or whether the judge would feel bound to abide by it anyway. Additionally, a final decision could bog down even if the ALJ sticks to Rosch's timetable. Even though FTC rules ostensibly require the ALJ to file an opinion within a set time period, the judge can claim extension for extra time to complete writing, without seeking approval from the commission.

Meanwhile, a parallel proceeding regarding the Whole Foods case continues in federal appeals court. The FTC is waiting to hear whether it will be asked to file a reply to Whole Foods' request for a rehearing by the entire circuit court. Whole Foods lawyers Tuesday asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to review the July 29 decision by a three-judge panel of the circuit court. Their ruling encouraged the FTC to jumpstart its in-house case. The FTC doesn't automatically get to reply; the agency has to wait for an invitation from the appeals court. A request for a reply, however, would likely be evidence that the appeals court is seriously considering a rehearing, which the FTC would surely oppose. -- Cecile Kohrs Lindell

See Aug. 27 story on TheDeal.com
See Aug. 25 story on TheDeal.com




Post a comment





The Deal Pipeline

Deal Video


Inside The Deal: Avaya Inc.'s Mohamad Ali on the company's next target.


More video...

Crisis On Wall Street
Technology
Deals of The Decade

Community

Industry Insight

Managing your shareholder base

Growth companies and their PE sponsors should be wary of the pitfalls that arise when they layer on tiers of preferred stock.


Industry Insight

Easing the stress of distressed M&A

Corporate buyers face numerous complexities when trying to identify the right moment to purchase a distressed asset.


Editor's Note

Editor's letter: Nov. 16, 2009

Beneath the veneer of Wall Streeters beats the same heart, stirred by the same determinants of behavior.


footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg


©Copyright 2009, The Deal, LLC. All rights reserved. Please send all technical questions, comments or concerns to the Webmaster.