The Deal
Sunday, November 22, 
8:28 am

Lehman, WaMu: Why the differences are important

  Share     E-Mail    Discussion    Print Story
Apples_and_oranges_Flickr.jpgBoth Lehman Brothers Inc. and Washington Mutual Inc. are testing record lows as the market reflects concern that the two may fail. But while they're viewed by many in the same light -- after all they're "banks" -- it's worthwhile to step back and think this through. In fact, they are quite different, with different economics and different regulators. A "collapse," if that's what we're talking about, would unfold differently as well.


Continue reading below

Also on Dealscape

Lehman is an investment bank, WaMu a thrift. Although these terms have lost some meaning since the end of Glass-Steagall and other Depression-era bank regulations -- look no further than universal banks Citigroup Inc. and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. -- Lehman and WaMu do mostly fit the old models. And while neither of them is as large as Citi or J.P. Morgan, a failure would have systemic repercussions, though at this point we don't have a clue about their scale. Those repercussions would, however, be very different.

The two institutions also have to deal with very different regulatory schemes. In the case of Lehman, the onus falls on the Federal Reserve, which since the Bear Stearns Cos. implosion has taken on responsibility for Wall Street. How the Fed might act is very unclear, since there is only one precedent -- Bear Stearns. The Fed is exploring new territories against a backdrop of a waning administration, an uncertain role in financial regulation going forward and a federal government that has just reached out to rescue two giant mortgage underwriters, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. How will those factors affect the Fed and Lehman? We can only speculate.

In the case of WaMu, the onus is on the Federal Deposit Insurance Co. and the Office of Thrift Supervision. The OTS would be in the room if WaMu failed, but the burden would fall on the FDIC, which has already been straining under the load of recently failed IndyMac Federal Bank. Still, the FDIC has been dealing with these situations for many decades. WaMu is not IndyMac; except for its mortgage exposure, WaMu has lots of attractive assets, including a national branch network and a hefty deposit base. In all probability, the FDIC would want another institution to quietly take over WaMu, then work out some means to deal with the bad loans (something it did do with IndyMac). Again, while WaMu could threaten the FDIC because of its sheer size, the federal insurer has a variety of ways to limit its exposure and to raise new funds. There was this thing called the S&L crisis once.

These two situations also have very different economic  dynamics. WaMu has a large deposit base that it can fall back on to fund its operations. OTS and the FDIC will pull the plug on WaMu when it's apparent that its losses have impaired its capital base; the timing could depend on the presence of a buyer or buyers. As an investment bank, Lehman depends on the market for its daily funding, and the market these days, based on its thudding share price, is getting very nervous. Lehman is more like Fannie and Freddie. The stock price is important, but the real signal that the end is near will come when the price of its overnight financing begins to rise, forcing the Fed to make some decisions. The fact is, given how long Lehman has struggled, it may resemble Drexel Burnham Lambert, which was allowed to fail, more than Bear, which was "rescued" by J.P. Morgan. That may well depend on the Fed's estimates of the effect on the system of a failure. With talk of a possible credit downgrade at Lehman, that eventuality is a lot closer today than a few weeks ago.

Of course, for federal regulators the best solution to both problems would be a buyer or, even better, survival. Both those options may prove easier for WaMu than Lehman. - Matthew Wurtzel


Troubled Wall Street
Prices at 11 am EDT Thursday
Name Price
at close
Price
at 11:00
Change Mkt cap
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. 39.4 39.5 0.1 135763.07
Lehman Brothers Inc. 7.6 4.49 -2.76 3117.86
Merrill Lynch & Co. 23.3 20.21 -3.09 30900.65
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. 157.59 151.03 -6.56 59476.34
Morgan Stanley 38.92 37.37 -1.55 41443.85
Citigroup Inc. 18.68 17.89 -0.79 97418.08
Fannie Mae 0.85 0.79 0.05 842.27
Freddie Mac 0.66 0.64 -0.02 413.12
Bank of America Corp. 32.4 31.69 -0.71 144509.97
Wachovia Corp. 15.08 13.96 -1.11 30148.41
Washington Mutual Inc. 2.32 2.02 -0.3 3444.83
Source: The Deal




Post a comment





The Deal Pipeline

Deal Video


Inside The Deal: Avaya Inc.'s Mohamad Ali on the company's next target.


More video...

Crisis On Wall Street
Technology
Deals of The Decade

Community

Industry Insight

Managing your shareholder base

Growth companies and their PE sponsors should be wary of the pitfalls that arise when they layer on tiers of preferred stock.


Industry Insight

Easing the stress of distressed M&A

Corporate buyers face numerous complexities when trying to identify the right moment to purchase a distressed asset.


Editor's Note

Editor's letter: Nov. 16, 2009

Beneath the veneer of Wall Streeters beats the same heart, stirred by the same determinants of behavior.


footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg


©Copyright 2009, The Deal, LLC. All rights reserved. Please send all technical questions, comments or concerns to the Webmaster.