The Deal
Sunday, November 22, 
6:51 am

What do Geithner and Summers have to do with Citi's woes?

  Share     E-Mail    Discussion    Print Story

US-DeptOfTheTreasury-Seal.svg.pngDays after President-elect Barack Obama announced his selection of Federal Reserve Bank of New York President Timothy Geithner as treasury secretary, a debate flared up about his readiness to oversee the Troubled Asset Relief Plan. Since then, a veritable chorus of detractors have begun to question Geithner's viability as a potential member of the Obama Cabinet. Some include economist and comedian Ben Stein and Edward Hellmore of British newspaper The Guardian, who both attempt to link Geithner to the failures of Citigroup Inc. by way of Robert Rubin.

Continue reading below

Also on Dealscape

Hellmore coined a new term for Geithner and his mentor Larry Summers -- "Rubinistas" -- because the pair are often associated with their former boss at Treasury, Rubin. Neither Hellmore or Stein are making a stretch to connect Geithner to Rubin (Stein conveniently omits the fact that Summers also worked for Rubin). However, just because they worked for Rubin doesn't mean they're tainted by Citigroup's woes. After all, both of them worked for Rubin long before he joined Citi, and they've had accomplished careers afterwards. Not that either writer is willing to concede that point.

Stein wrote of Geithner:
He's the pre-eminent careerist of old-time finance, and a basic part of the team that got us into this mess. He was pro-deregulation for most of his career.

What's Stein getting at? Geithner, unlike Rubin, has never worked on Wall Street, but is a career bureaucrat with stints at Treasury, the IMF and Federal Reserve (he was briefly at Henry Kissinger's consulting firm, but that's still pretty far from Wall Street). Even Summers, who Stein lavishes praise upon, has drifted closer to Wall Street than Geithner, briefly serving as a managing director at hedge fund D.E. Shaw & Co. after leaving Harvard University.

To make matters stranger, Stein, after veering off on a tangent about the dangers of New Deal-esque fiscal policy, pours on the praise for Summers and the rest of Obama's economic team:

On the positive side, Mr. Obama will have some fine economists on his staff, including Mr. Summers, the powerful Mr. [Paul] Volcker and Christina D. Romer of the University of California, Berkeley. They can help figure out what works and what is fantasy.

Talk about fantasy. Stein just loves academic economists, which Geithner isn't. Hellmore at least admits there's a link between Summers and Rubin, not to mention the two men's deregulatory bent in the 1990s. Although Hellmore doesn't note it specifically, it is widely known that Rubin and Summers along with former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan quashed attempts to regulate derivatives -- a move that may have exacerbated our current financial crisis. Hellmore's column offers some valid questions about putting a pro-deregulation economist, Summers, in charge of advising the president-elect on how to better regulate the financial system. Still, the Hellmore column elicits cackles from Portfolio's Felix Salmon, who took issue with some of its assertions about both Summers and Geithner as Rubin acolytes. Salmon refutes the notion of Geithner as a "Rubinista" by noting:

But if I recall correctly, Summers always stood between Geithner and Rubin on the Treasury org chart.

He also pointed out the absurdity of Summers as a Rubin clone:

It's even more ridiculous to think of Summers as a Rubin acolyte -- when Summers arrived at Treasury, he was already an academic superstar with a John Bates Clark medal to his name -- and he'd been chief economist of the World Bank.

Prior to Hellmore and Stein's assertions, the common wisdom was that Geithner was a Summers' protege. Salmon rightly concludes about the use of the term:

Sometimes, the protégé label is fair: think Paulson-Kashkari, or Rand-Greenspan. But I think it's a bit of a stretch to say that just because Rubin has screwed up at Citigroup, one should think less as a result of Summers or Geithner or [Peter] Orszag.

In the end, there are valid arguments and concerns to be had about both Geithner and Summers such as the Big Picture's Chris Whalen's argument about Geithner's role in Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.'s failure, and Hellmore's concerns about Summers' pro-deregulation past. But associating the two men with Citigroup's troubles is ridiculous guilt by association. - Matthew Wurtzel

See Stein's column from The New York Times
See Hellmore's column from The Guardian
See Salmon's post from Portfolio.com
See Whalen's post from the Big Picture

Matthew Wurtzel is the editor of Dealscape.





Post a comment





The Deal Pipeline

Deal Video


Inside The Deal: Avaya Inc.'s Mohamad Ali on the company's next target.


More video...

Crisis On Wall Street
Technology
Deals of The Decade

Community

Industry Insight

Managing your shareholder base

Growth companies and their PE sponsors should be wary of the pitfalls that arise when they layer on tiers of preferred stock.


Industry Insight

Easing the stress of distressed M&A

Corporate buyers face numerous complexities when trying to identify the right moment to purchase a distressed asset.


Editor's Note

Editor's letter: Nov. 16, 2009

Beneath the veneer of Wall Streeters beats the same heart, stirred by the same determinants of behavior.


footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg


©Copyright 2009, The Deal, LLC. All rights reserved. Please send all technical questions, comments or concerns to the Webmaster.