The Deal
Wednesday, November 25, 
12:56 am

Why we should not outlaw securitization

  Share     E-Mail    Discussion    Print Story

wrappedmoney.pngAs Washington contemplate the future of financial services regulation, one hot-button issue is how to handle the complex debt instruments that are at the center of the credit crisis. One idea bubbling up from the blogosphere via Bloggingstocks and CNBC: outlaw securitized products such as collateralized debt obligations or collateralized loan obligations.

Superficially, this sounds like a good idea. After all, many of the toxic assets weighing down bank balance sheet are securitized products like CDOs, CLOs or mortgaged-backed securities. But, like so much of the rest of finance, securitization is not a black or white issue. Should the rules of the securitization game change? Absolutely. Banks should keep more of these products on their balance sheet and put capital behind them. There should be limits on leverage. And of course both the credit ratings on the debt and the risk models applied to CDOs, CLOs and MBSs should receive greater oversight and testing.

Continue reading below

Also on Dealscape

However, treating securitization as if it were some sort of financial crime like a Ponzi scheme misunderstands both the good it can produce and the beneficial role it can play. Banning it would be akin to suggesting we outlawed IPOs after the dot-com bubble because so many flopped. Moreover, try to imagine what we would lose over the long term without securitization. Without these products you're not only going to see a lot less mortgage origination and higher prices, but also far fewer student loans and credit cards, as well as a serious decline in the car finance business and in the car industry. (Indeed, all those businesses are getting squeezed now because securitization has been dead for months, which explains why the Federal Reserve is rolling out a huge effort to restart it.)

Securitization is a tool banks and other financial services firms use to generate liquidity, which allows them to lend. If we simply outlawed it, we'd be rolling back the availability of credit by decades, just as the government is spending huge sums to restart student lending, credit cards and mortgages, and of course to save the car companies. Bernie Madoff was a crooked money manager. That doesn't mean we should ban money management. 

Outlawing securitization would mean an end to the American middle-class lifestyle. We should be careful what we wish for.  - Matthew Wurtzel





Post a comment





The Deal Pipeline

Deal Video


Inside The Deal: Cisco Systems' Ned Hooper on raising the bid for Tandberg.


More video...

Crisis On Wall Street
Technology
Deals of The Decade

Community

Industry Insight

REIT IPO deja vu

Real estate sponsors that might wish to undertake an IPO will need to consider a wide variety of issues and begin to take action long before the first filing with the SEC.


Industry Insight

Loan-to-buy

Paulson's proposal to purchase an equity stake in Yellow Pages publisher Idearc is the second time in recent months an investor group has used its prepetition debt position to execute a bargain price 'exit LBO.'


Industry Insight

Managing your shareholder base

Growth companies and their PE sponsors should be wary of the pitfalls that arise when they layer on tiers of preferred stock.


footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg


©Copyright 2009, The Deal, LLC. All rights reserved. Please send all technical questions, comments or concerns to the Webmaster.