The Deal
Saturday, November 7, 
3:20 pm

SEC register 'would kill a 3-partner VC firm'

  Share     E-Mail    Discussion (2)     Print Story

stark,michael125x100.jpgRegistering venture capital firms -- along with hedge funds and private equity firms -- with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as President Obama's administration plans to do, would be "very burdensome" for small VC firms, said Michael Stark, co-founder and general partner at Crosslink Capital.

He ought to know. As a hybrid firm that invests in both private and public companies, Crosslink is already registered with the SEC, possibly the only VC firm that is.

Stark's firm closed its $400 million Crossover Fund V LP in January of 2008, the largest crossover fund ever raised.

To comply with regulations, Crosslink must track the stock trades of all employees and those of employees' family members, including retirement accounts and college savings accounts.

The record keeping is "onerous," Stark said last week at an informal lunch in New York with  Andrew Garman, co-founder and managing partner at New Venture Partners, Peter Hebert, co-founder and managing partner at Lux Capital, and a few reporters from news organizations.

Crosslink boasts 22 investors, including Stark, and four employees in operations and finance.

"I think registering with the SEC would kill a three-partner VC firm," said Stark.

The National Venture Capital Association is actively lobbying the Obama administration to not tarnish the VC industry with the same brush as leverage-backed asset classes, such as hedge funds, as it embarks on a sweeping overhaul of financial regulations.

"There are enough smart people in the Obama administration to figure out the differences between asset classes," Stark concluded confidently.

Watch our previous video interviews with Crosslink's Michael Stark here and with New Venture's Andrew Garman here.  - Mary Kathleen Flynn





Comments

From: Jerome Fritsche,

As the CEO of a corporate finance advisory firm focused on assisting early stage companies in the life sciences and information technology arenas, I am most disheartened by what is occuring with Obama's policies. When Obama sought the presidency, his focus was on helping new emerging companies and job creation. Yet every policy of significance, such as mandating venture capital firms to re=gister with the SEC, is further proof that his words and actions don't necessarily synchronize with each other. But then, why should this be a surprise? When his Treasury Secretary first announced that the admisnistration was considering such an action on the VC's, a review of his comments reveals that our Treasury Secretary is not aware of the difference between a venture capital firm and a hegefund; a situation that I find most troubling.


From: joe Stafura,

Since it appears that the results from smaller VC firms are getting increasingly less attractive this is one asset class that should be left to die on it's own.

It isn't that people with money will not start businesses, it is that they will start them without paying some knuckleheads 2 and 20 to make the same bad decisions that they can make on their own.

Angel groups are a better way to group interested investors and provide a better understanding of the opportunity.


Post a comment



footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg footspacer.jpg


©Copyright 2009, The Deal, LLC. All rights reserved. Please send all technical questions, comments or concerns to the Webmaster.