| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
 The story of Washington Mutual Inc. is a horror story for bank executives and one that just won't die. Zombie WaMu has sparked tons of class-action lawsuits, and now at least one of those lawsuits will be heading to trial. Because WaMu shareholders would not bury the bank, the Pudget Sound Business Journal dug deep into the story behind the bank's failure. The paper discovered the bank failed after two bank runs occurred last year, executives may have misled shareholders in order to build capital, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.'s Sheila Bair may have been pitching the bank as a distressed asset sale as bank executives were looking for a buyer. The failure of WaMu was ultimately due to a lack of consumer confidence in the bank. The first bank run was actually right after the collapse of IndyMac in July 2008. The bank suffered $9.4 billion in withdrawals and was not reported to the shareholders or the public because it was able to build back that capital by "luring customers through a new certificate of deposit that offered 5 percent interest, a strong return at the time." The loans were sold cheap, and another concern for consumers and even employees that worked at the bank were ARMs, pay-option adjustable-rate mortgages, according to a report by the Pudget Sound Business Journal. But by July 2007, across the industry, big investors became alarmed
by how many borrowers were not paying off their loans, and stopped
buying packages of option ARMs. The number of bad loans on WaMu's books soared, scaring big depositors whose accounts weren't fully insured. When WaMu went under, the bad option ARM loans in its portfolio had nearly quintupled in the last 12 months to $3.2 billion. The second run occurred at the end of September after Moody's Investors Service (NYSE:MCO) downgraded WaMu's debt to junk status. WaMu customers pulled $600 million out of the bank that day. In the next three days, customers pulled another $2.3 billion. Customers pulled out another $2.4 billion on the day the FDIC regulators came knocking.After the Moody's downgrade, CEO Alan Fishman said he had approached Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE:WFC), J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) and Citigroup Inc. (NYSE:C). Fishman was trying to sell the bank for $8 billion by the end of September, the deadline regulators had given him so WaMu would not be listed as a problem bank. But the banks were one step ahead and knew WaMu could probably be purchased as a distressed asset through the FDIC. What ever happened next between Bair and the banks is unknown, but the report basically says the FDIC undercut the WaMu's sale process: Bair apparently told Fishman another intriguing piece of information: She said more than one bank had called the FDIC to ask whether there would be an opportunity to buy WaMu as a distressed asset, according to people familiar with the meeting. In other words, was the government planning to seize and sell the bank? If so, potential buyers would rather wait, for the price was sure to be lower in a government sale. What Bair might have said to the banks remains unclear, and is
likely to be a focus of at least some of the ongoing investigations.
Bair declined repeated requests to be interviewed about her role and
decisions. The FDIC released Bair's emails regarding WaMu. They were
almost completely redacted. Within days, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and Citibank stopped poring over WaMu's books. The story that the Pudget Sound Business Journal uncovers prompts many questions:
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett attorneys Barry Ostrager and Rob Pfister for former WaMu officers; Ronald Berenstain of Perkins Coie for former WaMu outside directors; Barry Kaplan of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati for former WaMu CEO Kerry Killinger; Peter Wald of Latham & Watkins for Deloitte; and Jonathan Dickey of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher for the underwriters. The trial also is likely to uncover more information that could prompt even more lawsuits. So, in effect, the failure of WaMu could haunt the banking industry for years. - Maria Woehr Follow me on Twitter @newsgirlmw Also see: WaMu zombie lawsuit ruling set for June Motion of Plaintiffs Washington Mutual, Inc. and WMI Investment Corp. for Summary Judgment pdf Brief in Support of the Motion of Plaintiffs for Summary Judgment pdf WaMu Documents FDIC attacked by zombie WaMu WaMu zombies arguments on the rise J.P. Morgan: The WaMu zombie slayer Judge quashes WaMu lawsuit
CategoriesComments
From: Maria Woehr
 ,
Hi TimFoilguy,
Posted on:
November 4, 2009 9:30 AM
 Deal Video
    Community
 Elsewhere on The Deal.comDealwatch
The Deal MagazineCorporate Dealmaker
The Deal VideoCategories
Blog roll
Archives
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
©Copyright 2009, The Deal, LLC. All rights reserved. Please send all technical questions, comments or concerns to the Webmaster.
to Maria Woehr
You are so positive that your version is correct. In my book that is not reporting .... that is opinionating. God help us if your effort here is what passes as reporting these days.