The Deal
Sunday, November 8, 
6:40 pm

Rising cleantech startup NanoGram hedges bet between licensing, internal R&D

  Share     E-Mail    Discussion    Print Story


Alternative energy and environmental technology developers are getting strong support from early-stage venture investors. Still, it's not yet clear whether the public markets will support capital-intensive projects to put development to use, or whether venture-backed companies are better off using licensing strategies to monetize their intellectual property

When biodiesel developer Imperium Renewables Inc. recently pulled a high-profile IPO, hopes for quick liquidity for early investors were dashed, but it left the company with greater flexibility in future financing. The latest large funding round for a solar developer shows a company demonstrating a middle course of investing in making its technology more valuable, but retaining flexibility for future development.

NanoGram Corp. was built solidly on the licensing model, having been created as the IP holder for thin-film technology in a three-way split of NeoPhotonics Corp. in 1994. NanoGram Devices and NeoPhotonics Corp. were created at the time as product companies and licensees of NanoGram, but NanoGram itself retained rights to further licensing, and initiated potentially huge partnerships with developers of batteries, flat panel displays, solid state lighting and myriad other applications. After raising more than $26 million to build facilities to create prototype products for others to license, however, the company's solar applications have proved to be so valuable in the current climate that it may shift its business model.

NanoGram's early-stage investors--ATA Ventures, Nth Power Technologies, Bay Partners, Harris & Harris Group, Institutional Venture Partners,
SBV Venture Partners, Rockport Capital Partners and B round leader Technology Partners--had originally positioned an $18.7 million round in January 2006 to get to profitability with the company's existing licensing model. Instead, the company put more effort into developing solar applications.

Rather than commit whole-hog to massive internal development of solar products and potentially risk diluting bets on the core technology, NanoGram's new $32 million round will advance the company's solar portfolio only to the stage where it can determine a future course of licensing or internal development. The company is betting that within a year it will be able to build a pilot plant for less costly solar modules using its proprietary materials.

NanoGram's global strategic partners coming aboard in the current round include manufacturing and development entities Global Cleantech Capital, Masdar Clean Tech Fund, Nanostart AG, Mitsui Ventures, Nagase & Co., TEL Venture Capital and Yasuda Enterprise Development. While these investors were chosen for their ability to help the company eventually expand on a pilot plant financed with the current round to build a vertical solar products development company, they also could be key partners in wringing the most out of a licensing strategy with that plant serving as a design prototype. - Clifford Carlsen

See Jan. 18, 2006 story from TheDeal.com

See Jan. 4 post from Tech Confidential

See Jan. 15 story from TheDeal.com

For more see Nanowerk, earth2tech and Extra Technology News



Continue reading below

Also on Dealscape





Post a comment




The Deal Pipeline

Deal Video


Inside The Deal: Linklaters' Schmidt says how regulators handled Pfizer Inc.'s acquisition of Wyeth is an outlier of how others merger reviews will be conducted.


More video...

Crisis On Wall Street
Technology
Deals of The Decade

Community

Industry Insight

Dealing with frozen bank lending

If your bank is not willing to lend, what can you do as your company continues to seek growth?


Judgment Call

The coming age of the renminbi

The Chinese currency will play an increasingly important role in international commerce and finance.


Industry Insight

Banking on PE investments

Howls of protest greeted the FDIC policy statement, but the financial services industry should get over it.



©Copyright 2008, The Deal, LLC. All rights reserved. Please send all technical questions, comments or concerns to the Webmaster.