-- Browse related stories from this regional report --
Route 128 revisited
Potholes, bioengineering and public money
The marriage of theory and practice
High hopes for high tech
Certain structures in Massachusetts embody this long history of
economic development. They have weathered the times, while generations
of businesses and industries have come and gone. They carry names like
The Shoe in Beverly and Boott Cotton Mills in Lowell.
Maynard, Mass., is an old mill town about seven miles southwest of
Concord and Walden Pond and midway between Route 128 and Interstate
495. The town's most prominent structure is simply called The Mill. The
formidable array of factory buildings hugs the banks of the Assabet
River. For a hundred years, beginning in the mid-19th century, the
building housed first the Assabet Manufacturing Co. and later the
American Woolen Co., both of which made woolen carpets, sweaters and
yarn. American Woolen at one time was the country's most important
supplier of material for military uniforms. A century later, Digital
Equipment Corp. bought the complex and centered its growing
mini-computer empire within its brick walls, employing thousands.
Both technologies became obsolete. None of the companies survived.
Their passing signaled tough times and regional decline. Many of those
still active in the area have all-too-vivid memories of the demise of
DEC, of fellow Massachusetts mini-computer companies Data General Corp.
and Wang Laboratories Inc., and of the sector in general. The early
1990s "were bleak," says Craig Randall, a former software engineer and
now a Ph.D. candidate at Bentley University in Waltham, Mass. "I told
my wife: Not only am I leaving Data General, but we're leaving
Massachusetts."
Randall returned and prospered. So, too, did the Route 128 corridor,
which built a diversified technology base in part on the remains of a
failed computer architecture.
The Mill is now called Clock Tower Place, after the large,
hand-wound clock that dominates the 13-building complex. Its 100-plus
tenants include Monster Worldwide Inc., which operates online help-wanted company Monster.com; a
computer games studio founded by recently retired Boston Red Sox
pitcher Curt Schilling; and the venerable musical instrument maker Powell Flutes Inc.
Erik Heels heads Clock Tower Law Group. He moved his
trademarks- and patents-based legal practice into the complex during
the 2001 recession. At the time, dot-coms dominated the venue. "The
week that I moved in, StartUp.com moved out. Perhaps I should have
taken that as an omen," he writes in an e-mail exchange. These days, he
continues, "I don't see one kind of technology being dominant. There's
a good mix here now."
According to Joseph Mullin, the public affairs director of Clock
Tower Place, the complex is 90% to 95% occupied. "We had two situations
where the health of the region was dependent on the health of one
company and look what happened. By having more than 100 tenants, five
or 10 of these may contract or go under, but there are five or 10 that
can take their place," says Mullin. "We're better off with a diverse
tenancy. So far, that's worked. We have not been hard hit" by the
economic downturn.
"It has an amazing ability to reinvent itself," says John Egan III, a Boston-based partner at Goodwin Procter LLP who co-chairs the firm's technology group. He could be talking about The Mill or about the 128 corridor in general.
SiCortex Inc. is a high-performance, low-energy computer
maker that occupies part of the old mill's second floor. The company
started up in 2004. Its first computer shipped last year. Since then,
more than 70 machines have been sold, at prices ranging from $25,000 to
just under $2 million. One of its biggest customers is the U.S.
government. "We're the only computer company here. We're the only one
left," says Christopher Stone, president and CEO. Stone is also a
refugee from Data General and was vice chairman of Novell Inc.,
the information technology management software company based in nearby
Waltham. Stone weighs the advantages of where he is now and what he's
doing. "It's a great place to be. All the talent's here," he says. Of
course, "this was designed to make wool sweaters, not computers. You
can still smell the lanolin on a hot day."
Stone's company has raised $67 million in venture funds in two
rounds. "The good news is we're generating revenue," he says, declining
to specify how much. "If I had a startup with no revenue, I'd be
looking to jump out the window."
That kind of reality check is commonplace in conversations with many
different companies around the greater Route 128 corridor, as well as
their financial backers and legal advisers, not to say academics and
politicians.
Given the financial meltdown and today's perilous times, it's no
surprise that those in the area are once more grappling with weighty
questions about economic health, both present and future. The stakes
are high for the entire New England region. While education, healthcare
and, to a lesser degree, financial services help fuel Boston's economy
and manufacturing pockets exist throughout New England, technology
remains core to the region's well-being. Basic research may be coming
out of laboratories in Cambridge, which also continues to support a
number of biotechnology companies, but it's Boston's western (and to a
lesser extent northern) suburbs that provide the bulk of economic
generation.
So far, the corridor has weathered the storm. But there are
troubling signs. "The economy here has held up pretty well," says Scott
Latham, a management professor at Bentley and another refugee from the
software industry. But he warns: "Small businesses are just going to
run out of money. They have strong management and are now doing OK, but
they're very anxious. A lot of innovative companies are going to die on
the vine."
Unemployment in Middlesex County, which encompasses much of the
corridor, stood at 6.4% in January. That's a 2.4 percentage-point
increase over a year earlier, but is far lower than comparable figures
in Silicon Valley. Nor does the area suffer from the crisis that has
infected Wall Street, not to say Detroit. "We're better off than New
York," says Clinton Harris, the managing partner at Grove Street Advisors LLC, an investment advisory group that specializes in private equity. "Silicon Valley is a lot less diversified than we are."
"The Boston economy is less hit than others," adds Jim Matheson, a partner at Cambridge-based venture capital firm Flagship Ventures.
"That's a function of innovation, research, development and deployment,
education, the relationship between public and private. ... The venture
market is working hard but working."
There's little unanimity, however, about what lies ahead for the
region. Moods range from pessimistic to sanguine. "Route 128. It's a
brand, but that's about it," declares Dana Callow, managing partner of Boston Millennia Partners and a longtime Boston-area venture capitalist. "You build where costs are lower."
"This corridor is going to outperform. We're going to feel less pain
than the rest of the country," counters Harris, who is based just off
Route 128 in Wellesley, Mass. "This town seems to bounce back faster
than other places."
While many views on the health and future prosperity of the corridor
may diverge, a few conclusions can be drawn from the experience of 128.
The most obvious is that the greater Route 128 corridor continues to
benefit from proximity to America's biggest and most prestigious
concentration of universities. The Massachusetts Institute of
Technology leads the pack but is by no means the only game in town. New
technologies, scientific breakthroughs and the scientists and engineers
to mine them come spilling out of Boston and Cambridge in an almost
constant stream.
"It's a huge, huge advantage," says Gary Magnant, CEO of Sage Science Inc.,
a startup in Beverly, Mass., toward the northeastern edge of Route 128.
Sage Science will begin producing research instrumentation for life
sciences next year. "That community think tank, that collective, is as
strong here in Boston as it ever was."
The area's technologically based economy is increasingly
diversified. Like Clock Tower Place, the Route 128 corridor no longer
depends on just information technology. Nor does it put all its hope
into biotechnology, for which the corridor also became known. "There's
a talent-pool depth and diversity," says Mouli Ramani, vice president
business development for Lilliputian Systems Inc., which is developing new battery technology. "I wouldn't bet against it."
Continued prosperity is increasingly tied to hybrid or convergent
technologies that make use of multiple technologies in various
applications. "I think that this [technology] engine is alive and well
and will do a lot over the next few years because of convergence," says
Martha Farmer, who heads North Shore InnoVentures, a technology
incubator scheduled to open its doors in July in The Shoe, an old
shoe-machinery factory in Beverly that now boasts perhaps 200
technology companies, 35 in life sciences alone. "When you bring these
technologies together, there can be a major-league leap."
One especially promising area is in environmental and clean
energy-related technologies, variously referred to as greentech or
cleantech. Much hype surrounds the state's role in this emerging
high-tech sector, but both startups and their financial backers believe
the area is primed for development.
"The biggest driver is education, specifically MIT. Surrounding that
is a culture of entrepreneurs and a ring of VCs," says Chuck McDermott,
a Boston-based partner at RockPort Capital Partners. "If you have that, you have cleantech."
"Massachusetts is a wonderful place to run this kind of company," adds Mitch Tyson, chief executive of Advanced Electron Beams Inc.,
whose industrial process cuts energy by 80% over traditional methods.
"We have a workforce that appreciates the environment. A lot of people
[in many different technologies] now want to work in clean technology."
Despite boasting the biggest concentration of venture capital
outside northern California, Massachusetts and its high-tech
establishment are beginning to feel a funding pinch that could turn
ugly. Right now, VCs are focused on existing portfolios. If the
recession continues into next year or if the recovery turns out to be
anemic and lengthy, even some startups with funding could be jettisoned
by their venture fund backers. "The so-called Valley of Death gets
larger and deeper," says Farmer, who spent years working in hemoglobin
pharmacology. "Venture capitalists are getting more and more
conservative. Everybody's risk-averse. It's going to be really tough
for a while."
"Getting investment the last year and a half has been tough. Funding
is tight," says Russell Cyr, co-founder and chief marketing officer for
Lowell-based BitWave Semiconductor Inc., which has developed a
universal programmable transceiver for cell phones. Production started
in December. The company has raised "a bit more than $40 million," says
Cyr. "We would like to be better capitalized. It is what it is."
"The exit situation is ugly" for the firm's technology companies and
venture capital group, says Greg Moore, a Boston-based partner at Ropes & Gray LLP.
Initial public offerings remain pretty much dead in the water, and even
buyouts are anemic. While this isn't unique to the greater Boston area,
it exacerbates funding issues and capital requirements. "This
credit-driven recession hit so many parts of the economy, it's pushed
out exit opportunities 12 to 24 months. That's a big bill to pay," says
Peter Shannon, a partner at Atlas Venture, based in Waltham.
"If this was something in just one sector, venture funds could respond,
but it's coming all at once. ... Companies need to find creative ways
to operate with less capital."
Cracks are beginning to show. Almost daily, there are reports of
high-tech companies downsizing or calling it quits. Vacancy signs
appear more frequently. New, speculative office buildings have trouble
attracting tenants. "My peers, Ph.D.s who are never out of work, now
they're out of work and will take whatever job they can," says Magnant.
"Some companies got sold. Jobs left. Startups failed."
In the past year or so, Inotek Pharmaceuticals Corp. shifted
gears from oncology to ophthalmology, moved from research to drug
development, downsized from more than 100 to 30 and relocated from a
large facility in The Shoe to much more modest digs along Lexington's
Hayden Avenue, one of the major arteries for biotechnology.
"During this transformation, we have three years' cash. It gave us a
safety net and time," says James Ham III, the company's CFO. "We have
enough cash to take us through next year. ... We feel we have a strong
compound. If we're successful, there's money out there."
Ham was recruited last year from drugmaker NitroMed Inc., located next door to Inotek. Last month, NitroMed sold the rights to its one drug and went out of business.
The ability to build large, standalone corporations remains a
nagging issue. Numerous conversations seem to inevitably turn to why
the Route 128 corridor just can't seem to spawn homegrown titans and
why once local companies reach a certain size, they're almost
inevitably acquired by more dominant companies elsewhere, especially in
California. Boston Millennia's Callow says his firm has invested in
nine companies that gained at least a $1 billion market cap. Only two
remain. The rest were acquired.
"That's the story of the last 20 years," says Ropes & Gray's
Moore. "I can't tell you how many Boston-area companies I've sold to
West Coast companies."
"We need larger companies. It's the shade-tree phenomenon, nurturing
others," says Goodwin Procter's Egan. "We need them to become large and
relevant and not to sell out."
That underscores an even bigger issue. Those companies whose
technologies come to dominate will not only prosper, but help their
location prosper as well. On that score, the Boston area hasn't fared
that well.
People around Boston are still smarting over the fact that Facebook
was developed at Harvard University and moved out West for commercial
development. "There's less an instinct for consumer marketing and
consumer branding than on the West Coast," says Jon Karlen, a partner
at Boston-based Flybridge Capital Partners.
"The East Coast has lost every platform and technology standards
battle with the West Coast since the mid-1980s," says Bentley's Latham.
"As a result, you don't see any large, dominant IT organizations on the
East Coast."
The single major exception to this trend, the management professor believes, is EMC Corp.,
the information technology giant in Hopkinton, Mass., near Interstate
495 southwest of Boston. But Latham and others speculate EMC could be a
target for a takeover, notably from IBM Corp.
As they survey the local scene from a booth in an Outback restaurant
in Lowell, Latham and Randall trade concerns about this kind of
corporate migration. They point to the Sun Microsystems Inc.'s laboratories, a state-of-the-art campus that was recently constructed on a hill in Burlington. They fear that once Oracle Corp. completes its $7.4 billion acquisition of Sun, the campus will close.
A corollary to a lack of corporate dominance is the lack of
manufacturing heft in the region. Take Konarka, for example, a model
for clean-energy technology. The company developed a plastics- and
carbon-based photovoltaic solar panel in the old Boott Cotton Mills on
the Merrimack River in the oldest part of Lowell. It has raised $150
million in venture and private equity funds. But Konarka went to the
old Polaroid Corp. X-ray plant in New Bedford, Mass., for its commercial production, which launched in March.
Magnant talks of his experience with companies that were acquired
and then moved, one to New Hampshire, two to California. "Historically,
Massachusetts does a really good job of creating [companies]," says
Magnant. "Then they're sold, and the manufacturing goes out of the
state."
Kathy McMenimen is a longtime city councilor in Waltham and an even
longer-term resident. Waltham, she says, is Route 128's "belt buckle"
and was at one time home to 10 major technology manufacturers including
Raytheon Co. and Polaroid. Now? Gone, she says. Either they're
out of business or the factories are elsewhere. Medical devices company
Thermo Electron Corp., for example, merged with Fisher Scientific
International Inc. in late 2006. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.'s
headquarters remain in Waltham, but its nearest production facility is
in Milford, Mass., 32 miles southwest. China now hosts five Thermo
Fisher plants.
"Manufacturing companies provided work opportunities at a variety of
levels for a variety of people," says McMenimen. "The demographics have
changed dramatically. I don't see that same middle-income level that I
saw when I moved here 40 years ago."
Yet people want desperately to remain in the neighborhood. And
that's perhaps the most upbeat conclusion that can be drawn. Executives
from a dozen different technology companies extoll the desirability of
the region. "People put down roots. They have a life," says Alex
Vasilevsky, who co-founded Virtual Computer Inc., which is
developing personal computer management software through what is called
virtualization. Peter Marconi, the company's vice president of
engineering, chimes in: "In California, it's who's got more money,
who's got three Ferraris instead of two. It drives me crazy."
The attraction of this swath of New England is easy enough to
understand, even during often-harsh winters. The corridor isn't the
endless string of faceless industrial parks, shapeless office buildings
and cookie-cutter housing subdivisions that typify Silicon Valley.
Rather, there are pockets of office complexes surrounded by terrain
that is bucolic and often heavily wooded. Residents marvel about an
ability to live in environments that range from forested mountains to
rugged seashore, from storybook village to thriving city.
If Route 128 -- now co-branded I-95 along one stretch -- and I-495 are
like bicycle half-rims, then some other arteries such as Routes 2 and 3
and I-93 are like spokes. The result: a catchment area that extends
from the shore northeast of Boston into New Hampshire and west to
rolling farmlands. "Within a 45-minute drive you can live in any
environment," says BitWave Semiconductor's Cyr.
"We're in a corridor that traverses many residential communities,"
says Howard Berke, Konarka's executive director and co-founder. "I can
attract talent from Boston and Cambridge to come up, New Hampshire to
come down. It takes me 35 minutes all on country roads to get here."
The transition from rarefied science startup and alpha-type venture
capital to the folksy outdoors can be immediate and jarring. In
Waltham, a cluster of ultramodern buildings on a site that formerly
housed Polaroid's research headquarters hugs a hillside overlooking the
Cambridge Reservoir. A few hundred feet away, the road narrows. Three
deer dart across the road into the woods.
Virtual Computer, for example, is housed in a faux colonial office
building just behind the Bamboo restaurant in Westford. Vasilevsky and
fellow co-founder Dan McCall are computer industry veterans teamed
together by their venture backers. They discovered they both lived
perhaps a mile apart in the postcard-perfect town, with its lakes and
its apple orchards. That explains why they put the company where it is.
"It's very seductive to live here," says Vasilevsky.
But the location isn't just a draw for the company's owners. "The
average experience of an engineer here is 20 years. Maybe 90% have less
than a 10-minute ride," says McCall. A group of eight engineers is
clustered around a white-board wall with yellow Post-its, representing
tasks and problems for the day. "If we were in Cambridge, we wouldn't
get anyone who's here."
That may be true, but there's definitely evidence that the recession
has made hiring easier for just about anyone. "We had one job posting.
We got 100 resumés in the first two days," says McCall. "There's a
whole deep bench of talent in this area."
Lilliputian Systems is about 20 miles due east in a far less
picturesque industrial park. The company sits in a building formerly
occupied by IntelliSense Corp., a boom-to-bust story in which Corning Inc.
acquired the software design company in 2000 for $750 million of
Corning stock, only to shut down the division three years later; the
previous owners then reacquired the remnants.
Two MIT graduate students founded Lilliputian Systems seven years
ago after inventing a kind of perforated silicon chip. The chip
produces electricity with minute amounts of electrolytes as a catalyst.
The company hopes its far more environmentally friendly technology can
eventually rival the lithium ion batteries now used as a power source
for consumer electronics. Commercial production is scheduled for the
third quarter of 2010.
So far, the company has raised $90 million in venture funding. It
closed on a $28 million Series D round in February. "This was the
hardest round ever," says Ramani, who has raised 12 rounds for various
companies in his career. "No one is being rewarded for taking any risk.
They're being rewarded for not risking one dollar."
Ramani conducts a tour of the facility: "Here, we make silicon wafers, the kind you would have seen at Intel." He points out what he calls "people in bunny suits." "Here's a room that could be Dow Chemical. This is the person in charge of our glass lab."
Ramani adds: "It's a multidisciplinary solution. There would have
been two or three different startup companies in the old days."
Just down the road is Advanced Electron Beams, a decade-old company that its venture backers -- Atlas, RockPort and General Catalyst Partners
-- believe should be a poster child for green technology with multiple
applications. The electron beam emitter made by the company goes into
machinery used in everything from sterilization of plastics to removal
of solvents. Nestlé SA is a customer. So, too, is a German manufacturer that sells to Johnson & Johnson.
Electron beam machinery has been around for a half-century, CEO
Tyson explains. What his company achieved is stunning miniaturization
that dramatically reduces both energy and water usage. Instead of a
traditional machine 10 feet by 20 feet, AEB produces an emitter that is
10 inches by 20 inches and is working on one that is only three inches
in diameter. "We're the laptop. The old ones are like mainframes."
After Tyson ticks off the various uses of the product, he lists the
variety of technology specialists required to run his 40-person
company: chemical engineers, biomedical engineers, physicists,
materials scientists, software engineers, mechanical engineers. Even
those working on the factory floor, he says, must be "technically
literate. They're on the verge of being technicians."
AEB, whose revenue totaled $5 million last year, has raised about
$36 million in two rounds. It is now trying to nail down a third round
of $15 million; a term sheet is coming, Tyson says. The company's three
existing VCs are all Boston area-based. So, too, is the prospective
fourth venture firm.
BitWave's offices occupy one small part of what is now called Cross
Point Towers, a mammoth 1.2 million-square-foot fortress-like complex
that's shaped like the letter W. It was built for $60 million in the
mid-'70s as a monument to An Wang and his dream of computerized word
processors and mini-computers.
After the company went bankrupt in 1992, the building was foreclosed
and sold at auction for $525,000 in 1994. Four years later, a joint
venture paid about $100 million for the property. Another consortium
offered $180 million in late 2007 before internal dissent and lack of
financing tripped them up and aborted the sale early last year.
As of March, it was 88% occupied. Tenants complain that if they
don't arrive early, it's hard to find parking within the shadow of the
building.
Michael Best, an emeritus management professor at the University of
Massachusetts, Lowell, explains the turns of fortune this way: "The
parking lot was full. The parking lot was empty. The parking lot was
full."
Comments
What a great article. I am from the area and enjoyed reading about all the former and current great companies. Thank You