Back to News
Activism

Adviser, Index Votes Show Contest Correlation

|
Published: December 1st, 2023
Similarities between recommendations made by ISS and Glass Lewis and the votes of big index funds managers drive election outcomes.

Large index fund managers are quick to assert their stewardship teams do their own work — uninfluenced by proxy advisory firm recommendations, especially when it comes to heated director contests.

However, a review of U.S. director contests that went to a vote through September, including one prominent “vote no” campaign, found that there is some correlation between recommendations made by Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. and Glass, Lewis & Co. LLC and the votes of the big three index fund managers, BlackRock Inc. (BLK), State Street Corp. (STT) and Vanguard Group Inc.

“While the big index funds have their own internal guidelines for proxy contests, our data suggests that in a majority of campaigns, their vote aligns with proxy adviser recommendations,” said Waheed Hassan, founder of ZMH Advisors.

In 17 cases in which BlackRock cast a vote on a director contest in 2023 about 75% of the time its vote was either partly or completely consistent with the ISS recommendation, Hassan said. ZMH’s analysis of Vanguard and State Street produced similar results, he said.

“There could definitely be a level of correlation, but it is not causation. That is an important distinction,” one corporate adviser said.

The correlation between proxy advisers and index fund votes in contests exists because at “a high level” the systems for both institutional investors and advisers are geared towards representing the best interests of shareholders,” the adviser said.

“It may be a different path to the same objective,” the adviser said, adding: “They would of course look at ISS and Glass Lewis recommendations but that would be a data point.”

While there’s a relationship between ISS and Glass Lewis recommendations and voting of index funds, there are nuances to the results of situations that went the distance in 2023, and exceptions to the trend.

Editor’s note: The original, full version of this article was published Nov. 17, 2023, on The Deal’s premium subscription website. For access, log in to TheDeal.com or use the form below to request a free trial.

This Content is Only for The Deal Subscribers

The Deal provides actionable, intraday coverage of mergers, acquisitions and all other changes in corporate control to institutional investors, private equity, hedge funds and the firms that serve them.

If you’re already a subscriber, log in to view this article here.

More From Activism

Activism

Activist Investing Today: Donahue Talks Vote-No Amid Activism

By Ronald Orol
|
Published: July 26th, 2024
Paul Hastings activist defense adviser Sean Donahue discusses nontraditional activist campaigns seeking to oust directors in uncontested elections, at special meetings and via written consent solicitations.
Activism

Elliott Eyes Starbucks Campaign Amid Slump

By Ronald Orol
|
Published: July 22nd, 2024
The Paul Singer-led insurgent fund is engaging with the coffee chain, which joined our Watch List of possible activist targets after it cut earnings and revenue forecasts.